It’s all a load of horseI think this is a tricky one. Seems the ref gave a penalty for a foul by Maguire which wasn't correct. So VAR look at it and think well maguire didnt do a foul sonits a clear and obvious error. If thye then analyse the shirt pull on its own, was that enough for a pen - i say they think it isnt enough and would be soft. So they say to the ref maguire didn't touch young do you want to take a look. He takes a look and says oh yes I see maguire did nothing so penalty overturned.
Whether they should.have shown him.thebshiry pull that he didn't see is a whole different question.
If the ref had spotted the shirt pull and said pen for the shirt pull to VAR I think they would not have intervened.
And the answer is yes. Goals are getting ruled out or given every week, for stuff the ref didn’t see. For some reason they didn’t want to show him the full incident.I think this is a tricky one. Seems the ref gave a penalty for a foul by Maguire which wasn't correct. So VAR look at it and think well maguire didnt do a foul sonits a clear and obvious error. If thye then analyse the shirt pull on its own, was that enough for a pen - i say they think it isnt enough and would be soft. So they say to the ref maguire didn't touch young do you want to take a look. He takes a look and says oh yes I see maguire did nothing so penalty overturned.
Whether they should.have shown him.thebshiry pull that he didn't see is a whole different question.
If the ref had spotted the shirt pull and said pen for the shirt pull to VAR I think they would not have intervened.
Utter bullI think this is a tricky one. Seems the ref gave a penalty for a foul by Maguire which wasn't correct. So VAR look at it and think well maguire didnt do a foul sonits a clear and obvious error. If thye then analyse the shirt pull on its own, was that enough for a pen - i say they think it isnt enough and would be soft. So they say to the ref maguire didn't touch young do you want to take a look. He takes a look and says oh yes I see maguire did nothing so penalty overturned.
Whether they should.have shown him.thebshiry pull that he didn't see is a whole different question.
If the ref had spotted the shirt pull and said pen for the shirt pull to VAR I think they would not have intervened.
I agree. I'm just saying how in think it went not wheter the end result was right or wrong. I think it was a penalty. I dont think VAR is corrupt it's just being used in a terrible way and open to masses of human error and panic incorrect decisionsUtter bull
Var should not have intervened at all.I think this is a tricky one. Seems the ref gave a penalty for a foul by Maguire which wasn't correct. So VAR look at it and think well maguire didnt do a foul sonits a clear and obvious error. If thye then analyse the shirt pull on its own, was that enough for a pen - i say they think it isnt enough and would be soft. So they say to the ref maguire didn't touch young do you want to take a look. He takes a look and says oh yes I see maguire did nothing so penalty overturned.
Whether they should.have shown him.thebshiry pull that he didn't see is a whole different question.
If the ref had spotted the shirt pull and said pen for the shirt pull to VAR I think they would not have intervened.
Gutting and just mind blowing the blatant unfairness of it all. If young dived then send him off with a second yellow.Keep watching it back and it keeps getting worse every time. If that's United or Liverpool at home it's not even spoken about in terms of VAR. All season we've been told it's a high threshold for a decision to be overturned yet just look at that today.
It's bigger than bullUtter bull
wasnt the one where siggurdson was on the floor in an offside position but pulled his legs in against united?So in recent seasons against United VAR has ruled out 2 late winners, a goal by DCL which would've got us a replay in an FA Cup tie and then a clear penalty today but of course it doesn't favour the 'big' teams does it?