The profit is selling the player next summer. We could just keep him for the season, play him, and sell him next summer and accomplish the same.
Also the way PSR is currently set up, your scenario is a wash for at least 3 seasons. We wouldn't...
Why are people making out that we have loads of money and PSR headroom.
In our last set of account we lost £53 mill and that was after taking in close to £73 million in player sales - so without we would have lost about £120 odd mill.
People...
I think that's a convenient way to think of it, but in practice we should be maximizing any windfall we have. We only get the profit injection once.
In addition, his fee and wages need to be accounted for on one of the P&Ls for the year...
Sorry mate - i dont know what this means - or what point you are making?
The rest of the post to? Im not sure that answers or rebutes any of my earlier points.
Im sorry - its not Friedkin money, its Everton money.
The cost and liability will be on the Everton profit and loss.
Was it Farhad Moshiri's money when we racked up all the losses that saw us nearly destroyed or was it Everton on the...
It would be quite astonishing if a 21 year old with caps for the most celebrated national team in world football couldn't get a work permit to be honest.
It would also leave us with the liability though, people seem to keep forgetting to mention that bit. If he gains in value it's great, if he tanks it's not. I'm fine with us using the multi club model for mutually beneficial arrangements, I'm not...
Yep. Suddenly signing a player for £30 million and then immediately loaning him out (when we desperately need a player in his position) is absolutely normal for us.
Wouldn't agree with you there. if you do a stake holder analysis the deal benefits Roma, TFG - im struggling to see how it benefits Everton, Everton hold the liability, outlay and risk and Roma get the benefit - while Everton get essentially what...