Mr Happy's latest activity

Goalie.

My ‘really’ was based on the fact you’d take him . I think we basically agree on the available information but disagree on our conclusion .

Think that's what I said.

Was ok, pretty decent in fairness, i think under Rodgers although could be wrong. Got a bad injury. Came back and was a poor imitation of Cuco Martina*. On a free wouldn't be a horrendous signing. *in a piss poor Leicester team.

I'm here all day for him.

Liked him at Leicester, and understand why he followed the manager to Chelsea. Hasn't done badly there when he had his chance, just never really seemed like he would be a good fit from the off. Could be a low key good signing, this.

Nuts this

….can never understand the angst, I like him. I think he’s important for the tempo of our game, terrific if we bring in better but certainly a valuable player to have around.

Cool. Like I said I don't agree with your opinion but that's cool.

@Mr Happy - Rather than discuss Mykolenko in the O'Brien thread, i'll respond to your post in this one. "I think we must be watching different players. He’s not Baines or Digne and that for some, me included means he's not all that but...

Take take take. Just like my ex wife.

I think we must be watching different players. He’s not Baines or Digne and that for some, me included means he's not all that but defensively he's pretty solid.

Fine. I don't know why it bothers you. Theyre one of the biggest clubs in the world, defo the main draw for the US. I made peace with the Big 6 bias from sky long ago. The bigger the club the louder the noise, hence why we get more mentions...

Good luck to him. Probably a big cricket fan. And partial to a Hooters. Liverpool couldn't offer him cricket so Notts Forest it was.

Blah blah blah, last on MotD, never get any pens and so on and so on. Change the record. We come across as a desperate fan base with the insignificance of things like commentary being biased.