No, not a ban but the way City and Chelsea hoard players, it`s just getting out of hand, they are literally in for every player.
Perhaps a limit on 1st team players registered, which there currently is, but then a limit on 1st team players...
Or you bring in a prospect to develop and learn. I'd rather have someone like that English lad at Toulouse over someone like Jonny Evans. (I know he's retired, was an example).
Media don’t like that he plays for Everton and a lot of them can’t get over what happened to their wet dream Van Dijk. Absolutely kill them that he’s by far and away England’s best keeper and one of the best international keepers at almost every...
Maybe, but in a window where we realistically need 6-8 first team players, you have to pick and choose where to prioritise. Long term yes we probably need to look at LB, but we’re not in dire straights if Myko starts next season.
https://getfootballnewsspain.com/everton-in-e40m-swoop-for-villarreal-star/
His wiki page doesn’t show the full stats for this year. It’s 19 goals in 41 games.
That’s basically a goal a game if you do the math 😉
100% mate. Such obvious bias towards the teams that sit within the ‘brand’, I would love it is the rest broke away and formed their own league. Leave the sly six playing each other six times a season and leave the rest of us with a level playing...
Yeah there is a big part of me that wished that they would have left and been kicked out of the domestic league.
People say but there would be less TV money and the teams wouldn’t be able to compete with the rest of Europe. Same as arguments...
Why would the women’s team pay. The Friedkins would as they would own both. Do you think Chelsea’s women’s team who make a loss each year are paying £200m