You mean the stats that professional football scouts use?
The eye test trumps nothing because people are blinded by bias and as such see what they want to see most of the time.
Stats are facts not opinion and theres a reason why teams are...
The xg stat backs him up as a good striker. Or at least scoreing the amount if goals he should be scoring with the shots hes had which is a good sign imo.
Are we seriously going to scrutinise every potential signing even right down to the XG stats to try and find a way of rubbishing them? lol this fan base I swear to god
Would be a good signing. I wanted us to sign him a couple of years ago. He's more of a RB than a LB though.
1 goal and 7 asssists last season. His general stats for the last season are impressive too:
not really, hes scored 11 goals but he should of scored 12.
So the chances hes missed equates to 1 goal. So either hes missed a shed load of shots from places of low xg that he was never going to score from (outside the box or really poor...
Yeah but Tommy T says he needs to play against Bate Borisov, FC Copenhagen, Legia Warsaw and Djurgardens IF otherwise he won’t be good enough for England
Im only presuming that because it doesnt make sense for them to quote us more then the transfer release clause and surely if they were making it up they'd research if they had a release clause...wouldnt they? :lol: