"We need to move from Goodison"

[TheFinnFan]

is there even theoretical chance to move from goodison (i know little about this topic)
(IF) we would have money and if peoples would be ok to that (i doubt peeps wanna loose goodison)
where that new stadium would be build? like, probably?

 

[Goat]

We could move to Villa Park!!!!!!

 

[chicoazul]

Looking it up I've mixed them up with the giants and feel like too bad of a tit to bother defending my point, slate me.

Your point still rings true lid, dig your heels in and start swinging all over the show ffs.

 

[Hibbert&Ernie]

Your point still rings true lid, dig your heels in and start swinging all over the show ffs.

Trust you to bring up 'swinging' in the Everton forum. Tut.

 

[Seamus Colemole]

We could move to Villa Park!!!!!!

Nah, thats in a worse state than Goodison mate.

 

[TheFinnFan]

We could move to Villa Park!!!!!!

or lets just dig a deep deep hole and play there???

 

[EFC NY]

Looking it up I've mixed them up with the giants and feel like too bad of a tit to bother defending my point, slate me.

Giants and Jets play in NJ. But American football doesn't have nearly as much tradition as a side like Everton, and the stadiums are less important to the fan psyche. Baseball is a better analogy.

 

[Goat]

Nah, thats in a worse state than Goodison mate.

We could merge with Villa, become Asterton Villaton and rule the World with Lerners Millions!!!!

 

[Hibbert&Ernie]

or lets just dig a deep deep hole and play there???

Celtic & Rangers play each other every week there mate, it's called Scotland.

 

[TheFinnFan]

Celtic & Rangers play each other every week there mate, it's called Scotland.

hehe
good one

 

[Warzycha's Caterpillar]

If every one of us nicked a brick and left it outside the ground on a matchday we could probably save the club 40% of the costs.

 

[andrewkgsmith]

Giants and Jets play in NJ. But American football doesn't have nearly as much tradition as a side like Everton, and the stadiums are less important to the fan psyche. Baseball is a better analogy.

Maybe that's true, but if we're taking that line then it'd not be a case of location, just a case of not moving at all, which the Yankees and the Mets both did (Wikipedia BEYATCH).
Sure, they stayed in New York, but I'm sure if they were in a position where it'd be very difficult to build in New York and easier and more realistic to build elsewhere (but local), they'd do it.

 

[Jamo Martinez]

I'd rather redevelop Goodison if there was a choice.

Anyway, how can we do anything if were skint lid?

It'd be like a new stadium

 

[Jamo Martinez]

Me too!

Good question. But I heard him on Sky Sports about 2 weeks ago saying that we're trying our up most to move. Just like he's trying his up most to sell the club..

However he also says that money for buying players and money for a new stadium are separate?[/QUOTE] So we've got two pots with nothing in them

 

[EFC NY]

The Yankees moved across the street (50 yards, tops), and the Mets just moved to another spot in their huge parking lot.

Forget the Mets, though. They have only been around since 1962. No one cared about their "old" stadium. With the Yankees, there was a lot of angst about their move, but the new stadium was built to look very much like the old one, and in fact looks more like the old one did before its mid 70s facelift.

You are correct, imo, that they both would have moved elsewhere if the economics/logistics required it.