"Moyes wouldn't get it to spend"

[sirblue57]

Case in point, you lads do less for your cause by your loansomes.

so you gonna put up these successes then?

 

[Tubey]

Last four transfer windows: £27m brought in > £21.5M spent by Moyes.

When I see that stat, even I have to admire what Moyes has done over the last four years to simply stop us being relegation fodder.

 

[chicoazul]

Does every thread have to turn into a Kenwrong/board is crap/boo tedious o'tedious fest?

Come on lids.

 

[davek]

Does every thread have to turn into a Kenwrong/board is crap/boo tedious o'tedious fest?

Come on lids.

You already know the answer to that.

 

[stinger]

Last four transfer windows: £27m brought in > £21.5M spent by Moyes.

When you would add money we spent on wages for Heitinga, Distin and Bilyaletdinov it would probably cover most of the difference comparing to Lescott sale and getting his salary off books (probably on Distin and Billy level).

 

[chicoazul]

You already know the answer to that.

My faith is not waivering brother davek, have no fear.

 

[davek]

When you would add money we spent on wages for Heitinga, Distin and Bilyaletdinov it would probably cover most of the difference comparing to Lescott sale and getting his salary off books (probably on Distin and Billy level).

But in that period we also got rid of other people off the wage bill: Pienaar, the Yak, Yobo, Jo, Neil....

 

[stinger]

But in that period we also got rid of other people off the wage bill: Pienaar, the Yak, Yobo, Jo, Neil....

Most of them went of the books for last 6 months and we can't be sure that for example Leicester were paying 100% of Yak salary. On other side you have Distin, Billy and Heitinga who had to be paid for last 2 years.

 

[Neiler]

When you would add money we spent on wages for Heitinga, Distin and Bilyaletdinov it would probably cover most of the difference comparing to Lescott sale and getting his salary off books (probably on Distin and Billy level).

Not to mention Wolves had a sell on clause in the Lescott deal.

 

[Deleted member 28206]

You know what, i can't even be assed arguing, you argue for being argumentitive.

This is all that matters to me.

You're arguing seemingly over Mr Kenwrights lack of input to the club, well i tell you what, when you are rich enough and savvy enough to run a business, a multi million pound business which Kenwright does, come back and i'll listen, but for now. It's just noise.


Instead of incessant arguing on a forum about the massive potential of the club that Kenwright is holding is back from.

I think all of your opinions are valid, i don't agree with many of them but thats because i believe in facts.

1. Fact 1 is we have a good team
2.Fact 2 is we have a fantastic manager
3.Fact 3 We love to knock our own down

Once we get over fact 3, we'll have the best fans in the country, either get behind him, or get out.

Thats my two pence.

 

[Matt Damon]

My faith is not waivering brother davek, have no fear.

Chico's already down for his Ebepton scarf.

 

[Chang Elephant]

Fact 3 We love to knock our own down
either get behind him, or get out.

He tried to move us to Kirkby (ffs) to an "effectively free" (£100M plus) box/stadium, to maximise his own share sale value. Not one of our own, I'm afraid.

 

[Philw]

I think this is not understanding the actual reason people dislike our board.

It's not that he'll get the money; it's just that the money will be claimed as investment from the board. Like when we "broke our transfer record fee" on Fellaini and Yakubu etc., which were in actual fact recycled funds from sales.

The board haven't invested anything in the playing squad at all since the mid-90's. Nearly two decades of treading financial waters and people wonder why people get frustrated.

Well the money may have been recycled, but you can't claim we didn't break it!! Our record (net) spend you could argue over, true, but that statement is true...

 

[Deleted member 28206]

He tried to move us to Kirkby (ffs) to an "effectively free" (£100M plus) box/stadium, to maximise his own share sale value. Not one of our own, I'm afraid.

Baffling response.

 

[duncan's pigeon]

You know what, i can't even be assed arguing, you argue for being argumentitive.

This is all that matters to me.

You're arguing seemingly over Mr Kenwrights lack of input to the club, well i tell you what, when you are rich enough and savvy enough to run a business, a multi million pound business which Kenwright does, come back and i'll listen, but for now. It's just noise.


Instead of incessant arguing on a forum about the massive potential of the club that Kenwright is holding is back from.

I think all of your opinions are valid, i don't agree with many of them but thats because i believe in facts.

1. Fact 1 is we have a good team
2.Fact 2 is we have a fantastic manager
3.Fact 3 We love to knock our own down

Once we get over fact 3, we'll have the best fans in the country, either get behind him, or get out.

Thats my two pence.

I'm with you mate, some people just love to moan!!!!

BTW that graph goes to show the dip is when Bill must have started going to the match, obviously his fault for the relegation in the fifties. Probably jibbed in to the boys pen as well!!!!