Again time scales. Wyness is stating a fact we annot stay at Goodison as it is for a length of time. We can obviously stay at Goodison in the interim as we are at the moment. You are an intellegent guy- surely you can understand this?

Again time scales. Wyness is stating a fact we annot stay at Goodison as it is for a length of time. We can obviously stay at Goodison in the interim as we are at the moment. You are an intellegent guy- surely you can understand this?
That's not the point mate. The point is BK has said that we will stay at GP if we have to. But Wyness is saying 2-3 years, maybe less, and we will fail safety checks. So they must have a backup plan. But they don't appear to have one.
Ok, think of it like this. Manuel Fernandes was coming to the club, all sorted. He [Poor language removed] us over, so we are left without a player of his calibre, and it then becomes too late to do anything about it.
So if/when the Kirkby Project falls through what are they going to do? That is what concerns me. Plus, if they say well we will have to do something at Everton, than why don't they concentrate on that instead of pushing Kirkby. Someone as Blue as BK should be moving heaven and earth to remain at Goodison instead of hiding behind Wyness and his so-called experts.
dont think your being entirely fair ghost, you nor i can speak for 3 years into the future, the soundbite in the summer was £500k a year to maintain the steel structure of goodison and its only becoming a larger figure.
can the kirkby project fall through now? im not sure it can, it appears too late in the day to renege on this course of action.
all this talk of plan A and plan B, staying at goodison is no plan, its a continuation of the current problem.
What I really dont understand about all this is that I see it very straight forward.
Goodison has been looked at and looked at to redevelop not just by this regime but by others in the past. The funds do not stack up- this is a fact.
Kirkby is a deliverable project that is being offset by Tesco - This is a fact.
If Kirkby falls through we will have no other option but to stay at Goodison in the mean time- This is a fact.
We would then have to hope that either more money or another way arises (squeeky bum time in my eyes) to develop Goodison. This to me is resting on our laurels and just hoping that something else comes along.
So your saying this.
1. The Kirkby Project is already done and dusted, nothing can stop it.
2. There is no plan B.
Is that what your saying?
Assuming its the same planning department that decide on the Asda thing as decided to give the land to the club in the first place I'd be amazed if the verdict went against us. Failing that Kenright could always give Labour a few pence, presumably via one D.Dean or someone to grease the wheels.
This is also significant to the rebuilding of Goodison, closing a stand to build a new one would mean a significant decrease in capacity which equals a significant decrease in funds add to this the extra money being spent on it means it is not feasible. A ground share option for a year or two would be the only option. Share with the [Poor language removed]?