2018/19 Marco Silva - New Poll Added

[Toffeelover]

He also says the word 'obligated'. Like a lot. Doesn't mean anything though.

A lot of what he says means nothing just good at the waffle if one hear and understand him.

 

[Toffeelover]

I hope his ass is sacked if we get beat.

No chance he has been reprieved from death row.

 

[chrismpw]

A lot of what he says means nothing just good at the waffle if one hear and understand him.

This is my experience too. He's just not at all interesting to listen to - bland, sanitizer, characterless waffle. No humour, no passion, no unique insight. Quite how he motivates people with that mumbling monotone is beyond me.

Mind you, the bland questions from the media don't help.

 

[Death]

To be most liberal on the Silva defence criticism you would say it's both the players and Silva blame which still doesn't get Silva off death row.

 

[Death]

No chance he has been reprieved from death row.

To be most liberal on the Silva defence criticism you would say it's both the players and Silva blame which still doesn't get Silva off death row.

That's a coincidence.

 

[granter79]

This is my experience too. He's just not at all interesting to listen to - bland, sanitizer, characterless waffle. No humour, no passion, no unique insight. Quite how he motivates people with that mumbling monotone is beyond me.

Mind you, the bland questions from the media don't help.

Think his personality is a problem tbh. Very bland and not engaging. Seem to get cut some slack from the media if you have a bit about you which he doesn't . This has to be same in the dressing room and is a problem for motivating players

 

[GwladysBlue]

How does this make sense? It clearly wasn’t, because we lost the match.

He’s rivalling Martinez with the amount of bollocks he comes out with.

 

[LocalNative]

How does this make sense? It clearly wasn’t, because we lost the match.

He’s rivalling Martinez with the amount of bollocks he comes out with.

Break it down again. And please, remember his first language isn't English.

'He chose the best team, he thought, that could win the match'.

 

[GwladysBlue]

Break it down again. And please, remember his first language isn't English.

'He chose the best team, he thought, that could win the match'.

So he thinks starting players like Walcott is going to win us games? It’s worse than I thought.

 

[neil999]

[QU

How does this make sense? It clearly wasn’t, because we lost the match.

He’s rivalling Martinez with the amount of bollocks he comes out with.

engage your brain, thats the team he believed was the best to cope with man city...you may not agree with it but its pretty clear what he is saying

 

[COYBL25]

Break it down again. And please, remember his first language isn't English.

'He chose the best team, he thought, that could win the match'.

Give up now mate, it’s like trying to stop Fred West enlarging his cellar.

 

[4737carlin]

How does this make sense? It clearly wasn’t, because we lost the match.

He’s rivalling Martinez with the amount of bollocks he comes out with.

He just picks random names out of a hat and starts him, his team selections are like this tactics, all over the place

 

[GwladysBlue]

[QU


engage your brain, thats the team he believed was the best to cope with man city...you may not agree with it but its pretty clear what he is saying

You’re putting words there that aren’t.

 

[Parker]

You’re putting words there that aren’t.

You're misreading the quote. You've always got to remember that English is not his first language.

"It was clear to me that it was the best XI to win the match".

Thats what he thought was the team that would give him the best chance of winning the match.

Add to that, that he might not even think that but is saying it purely because he has to. He's not gonna say I dropped Richarlison to rest him ahead of a more winnable game is he?

 

[PhilM]

Add to that, that he might not even think that but is saying it purely because he has to. He's not gonna say I dropped Richarlison to rest him ahead of a more winnable game is he?

Or that he's been blowing out of his backside for a few games now and almost looked disenchanted when you consider his recent theatrics - it is what it is!

It's easy for people to complain with the wonderful advantage of hindsight but in reality we did a fairly decent job against City, so to an extent he was correct.

Walcott was woeful in an attacking sense, especially for the first half, and didn't mark Sane particularly well, however usually it's something he's fairly capable at.