1 win in 6 with a favourable run of games, thats the facts.
And I'm saying our defence was quite clearly not the problem today, our defence is not what let us down today mate, it was the fact that we didn't take our chances.
Okay you believe in good defence that's fine but how come their defence was far and beyond worse than ours today yet they didn't lose?... They won because they have two (very expensive) strikers there who can take chances (even though the second obviously shouldn't have stood)
And I'm saying our defence was quite clearly not the problem today, our defence is not what let us down today mate, it was the fact that we didn't take our chances.
Okay you believe in good defence that's fine but how come their defence was far and beyond worse than ours today yet they didn't lose?... They won because they have two (very expensive) strikers there who can take chances (even though the second obviously shouldn't have stood)
1 win in 6 with a favourable run of games, thats the facts.
They were poor as a result of us pressing them high, putting them under pressure and forcing them back towards their own goal - only got ourselves to blame for not taking our chances.arsenal were poor, thats the worst i have seen them play since I can remember and we still lost 2-0.
think about that...
6 points from 18 available. Against the run of fixtures we've had it's been a terrible start for Marco.
Why do we always look at the results to judge managers rather than the performances? Out of those 6 games we've only played poorly in 2 of them, the others we were extremely unlucky thanks to a combination of individual errors, red cards, and shocking officiating. Other than Huddersfield/West Ham we've played well in all of our games so far.
Why do we always look at the results to judge managers rather than the performances? Out of those 6 games we've only played poorly in 2 of them, the others we were extremely unlucky thanks to a combination of individual errors, red cards, and shocking officiating. Other than Huddersfield/West Ham we've played well in all of our games so far.
Because points decide where you finish in the league.
A team can defend poorly yet keep a clean sheet mate, just as a team can defend well yet still concede. If our finishing wasn't so lackluster and continually letting their defenders off the hook then we'd be coming back with points in the bag.Because of their keeper. I just don’t understand how can their defence was worse than ours when we conceded two goals as an unit. They kept a clean sheet.
To add to all the misery, am I the only one who feels the team lack of fitness to compliment a high pressing game?
The players were clearly struggling at the later stages.
Performances should come after results. You build a winning team, then add the flair. People are so afraid of being labeled “boring” nowadays they put the cart before the horse.Why do we always look at the results to judge managers rather than the performances? Out of those 6 games we've only played poorly in 2 of them, the others we were extremely unlucky thanks to a combination of individual errors, red cards, and shocking officiating. Other than Huddersfield/West Ham we've played well in all of our games so far.