• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

VAR

Are you a FAN

  • Yes

    Votes: 126 30.4%
  • Nope

    Votes: 265 63.9%
  • What's VAR

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Pineapple on Toast

    Votes: 21 5.1%

  • Total voters
    415
Status
Not open for further replies.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-c...nt-failure-var-award-harry-kane-two-penalties


Fifa is to analyse the failure of video technology to award Harry Kane two penalties in England’s opening World Cup win over Tunisia.

Amid outrage on social media about the lack of action taken when Ferjani Sassi and Yassine Meriah bundled Kane to the floor during the match in Volgograd, the game’s governing body confirmed it would examine whether Video Assistant Referee Sandro Ricci had blundered by not advising Wilmar Roldan to penalise them.

Just a day earlier, Fifa had publicly backed all VAR interventions in the opening 11 games of the World Cup, amid another controversial call during Brazil’s 1-1 draw against Switzerland.

It is understood its referees’ chiefs will stage a press conference at some point during Russia 2018 to run through some of the disputed decisions on key incidents in matches, potentially once the group stage is complete.

A similar briefing was held on the eve of the World Cup in which video clips were played that had been shown to each team before the tournament of incidents for which there would be zero tolerance.

They included grappling in the box, with Fifa’s refereeing director, Massimo Busacca, revealing players had been warned there would be nowhere to hide in Russia.

One possible reason for Kane not being awarded a penalty for the first incident could be that John Stones appeared to simultaneously push Tunisia’s Ellyes Skhiri.

For the second, images seem to show Kane had hold of Meriah’s arm as the pair tangled.

But three former Fifa referees, Keith Hackett, Graham Poll and Mark Clattenburg, all agreed Kane should have been given two spot-kicks.

There was also criticism on social media over a lack of review after Ashley Young appeared to catch Tunisia captain Wahbi Khazri in the face with an elbow. Roldan decided the matter warranted only a lecture.

The World Cup has been dogged by VAR controversy and former Premier League referee Mark Halsey said on Tuesday it was not ready to be used at such a high-profile event.

He told BBC Radio 5 Live: “I think there’s a lot more training and education to be done because it should not be in this tournament.

“They should be looking at it to bring it in for the 2022 qualifying stages and then into the tournament.”
 

VAR is boss.

Absolutely nothing to do with the fact I've backed Salah anytime scorer at Hills enhanced 3/1.
 
A tackle in the professional game? No. A tackle in a junior league or pub match? Plenty of times with good, bad, careless and downright reckless. Quite what any of that has to do with the VAR decision is again completely irrelevant. Sliding in and tripping someone can easily be construed as careless within the laws of the game.

Careless is different to reckless or violent.



It's not the sliding element that causes the foul. Risdon slides from behind and trips Griezmann. Touching the ball does not cancel out a foul. The ball running through to the keeper or going out of play does not cancel out a foul.

My argument is not about the rule, or in support of the rule, but instead about whether the correct decision was made according to the rule.

Personally I do think it's a very soft penalty. Risdon has done well to recover but he has tripped Griezmann and those are the rules.



Mine, the refs, those in the VAR room and plenty of others apparently.

Wake me up when you’ve finished. Soft penalty. Yes.
 

If it helps stops the divers I am for it. It always seemed to me that bigger teams get the better decisions, maybe now that will change.
 
Can't help thinking that the people saying 'VAR got that decision right, therefore it's good' are somewhat missing the point. They should always get it right, they can watch it as many times as they want. The issue is that it's completely arbitrary, so it doesn't actually solve any problems, it just changes what the problems are. Some of the tackles in the Argentina game last night should definitely have been punished by cards, but VAR doesn't get involved, then you've got the Kane stuff from the other day etc. We've now just got a situation where VAR helps the ref with some decisions, but most of the bad ones remain, so teams will still feel just as hard done by - if not more so because rather than just shrugging it off as human error, they know feel like it's a big conspiracy.
 

VAR is just complicating matters. The fact it missed the two Rugby tackles on Harry Kane for England on Monday proves how inconsistent it is.

There have even been some VAR calls where people are still disagreeing with each other. I would rather everyone accept interpretation as part of Football and leave it limited to goal line technology. The fact people are still unsure about celebrating goals because of VAR reviews takes the essence from Football. This isn't Rugby.
 
VAR has been great but today just shows how important it is, was very brave for the ref to even think about admitting he got it wrong first time around, good stuff
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top