He's not guilty mate, but as much it seems he was "not proven" in the Scottish legal system. It is worth noting though, just a few weeks earlier the same organisation acknowledged they also found Mark Sampson not guilty (in infact completely innocent, they went far beyond what they said about Firmino) for language they would not just accept was guilty of racism to their standards, but also to a criminal standard under the 2010 Equalities Act. Alongside this report they also acknowledged that every single one of their employees needed urgent training on race relations, and being able to understand what racism was.
This case has only been brought out, not out out of any acknowledgement of wrong doing by the FA, but because the woman in question kept pushing, through 2 separate investigations where Sampson was cleared.
During the investigation of this case, one of the leading figures within the Football Association actually went back again on what they had said above, and said that actually the criminally racist behaviour was in fact only problematic due to (in the case women's) inability to grasp "banter".
Thats the context of the organisation charged with trying to get to the bottom of this. I don't have any faith in the football association to prosecute racism, or even understand what racism really is. I don't think the urgent training they accepted they required has sunk in enough.
I have no idea what was or wasn't said. I have seen none of the documents about what people may or may not have heard. I only go on the information that we have to hand. We have a football club who are serial offenders when it comes to racism. A Football club who have still yet to apologise to Patrice Evra, a decision that has led to him getting dogs abuse at the weekend. A club that openly supported a footballer and made an icon of him once they knew he was racist.
We have a footballer, with a genuine reaction, bringing an accusation that we know only gets brought in moments of extreme distress for black people, not because they are worried about pushing someone over. Standing up to racism has never been about trying to cover one self and the insinuation it does is an extension of the racist outlook that permeates the club who are making it. The young lad has also been told he has behaved impeccably "in good faith" but that there wasn't enough evidence.
We then have an organisation in charge of investigation who couldn't establish guilt, in a case they later acknowledged was guilty not just to their standards but to that of criminal standards.
Thats the context. Thats what we know. The rest is conjecture.