ijjysmith
Calm
yeh, wouldn't be going anywhere near him.
I'd rather stick with Koeman
Yes, and that is utter rubbish. He is crap and couldn't learn passable English at Watford.
Yes That's him mate.
Calling bull on that one then.
yeh, wouldn't be going anywhere near him.
I'd rather stick with Koeman
Yes, and that is utter rubbish. He is crap and couldn't learn passable English at Watford.
Yes That's him mate.
A twenty minute 'acceptable' performance, where we were unable to convert chances, does not negate the awfulness afterwards and in previous games.Yup, we were looking good in that 4-4-2 right up to Burnley scoring
Calling bull on that one then.
Yup, we were looking good in that 4-4-2 right up to Burnley scoring

I don't think sacking a manager makes a club ambitious, but I would expect an ambitious club to sack a manager when things have clearly gone south. Chelsea did it with Mourinho, United with Moyes, Liverpool with Rodgers. Clubs with real ambition don't accept poor performance for long.
Just as a genuine question, did you view Palace as ambitious when they sacked FDB?
Like, I'm not sure the main criteria of an ambitious club is sacking a manager, that's all - even though if Koeman was shown the door then I wouldn't really care.
It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the people running the club thought a rubbish ex-Watford manager was perfect to replace Koeman
That's very Everton
Terrifying.
Palace got rid after 4/5 games, we've had 14 we spent 150m and the trend in our current awfulness started about 5-7 games at the end of last season mate.
The manager already publicly contradicted the owners ambitions about the season, we loo likely to bomb out of Europe and a domestic cup early.
I wasn't saying sacking a manager us a sign of an ambitious club, more an ambitious club does and would sack a manager who has delivered what we have seen since April.
Sure would be an eye opener for those thinking we're too good for the manager of the World Champions...