I just want to address the part in bold, as that wasn't what I was trying to do at all
I was merely pointing out that as I was at the match, I didn't have access to a replay and thus could only judge the cross on what I saw in person, you had a replay so you could see I was wrong. There was a suggestion from yourself that I was picking on Enner by saying he did a bad cross when he didn't. From my view, it looked like a bad cross and when you said the replay showed it was a good one I took you at face value and removed it as a criticism
There was no suggestion on my part that my opinion was "better" than yours, just merely an explanation as to why I gave the opinion I did
The rest is what it is, but I wanted that to be clear, because it would have been a scummy move on my part to suggest someone who wasn't at the match had a less valid opinion on something, unless it's about something the TV cameras don't see that you need to be an eye witness for, or it's about someone having a direct go at the actual crowd over something that perhaps isn't fair because there were mitigating factors that you'd only appreciate if you were in the crowd itself
Cheers