Pabbers
Player Valuation: £60m
Scholes was world class at 22 Friend.
No he was not, at all.....England debut at 23.
Scholes was world class at 22 Friend.
Lampard never, ever controlled a game. He made a living off getting into the box and scoring/assisting - he was brilliant at it. Not once was he Chelsea's playmaker though.
We expect Barkley to be the complete package. He's getting there, but it's taking a while. That's fine. The best thing he can do at the moment is eradicate the silly mistakes he's been making for the past two years out of his game. It needs a lot of determination from him and a string manager - he definitely has one of them...
Well no, he wasn't. Scholes played just over half the games in the period, and was not even anywhere near close to the player he developed into.
But lets destroy Ross for not being complete at 22.
Gibson also won more than what Ross has....
His stats from his first 4 seasons in a team that won the PL twice and the FA Cup
View attachment 29250
But no it's fine, keep deluding yourselves into thinking Ross is better than one of the greatest footballers this country has ever produced as a 22 year old.
Ross also plays a more attacking role than those players and doesn't contribute defensively as much as those players did. A more suitable comparison in role/generation would be Raheem Sterling 132 apps/ 28 Goals /18 Assists/ 46 combined at 21 years old. I thought he was terrible at Liverpool and last season at City but watching a few City games this season he has stepped up another level where Ross has gone backwards.
Yeah you're right but most of those appearances I'd wager were as sub. He didn't really hold down a starting spot till he moved into midfield. And Liverpool won trophies because Gerard dragged them through on so many occasions. He was their stand out player.Scholes played as a striker!
Plus you have to take into account the teams they were playing in.
Scholes and Gerrard were in multi-trophy winning teams playing alongside top quality players.
And so was the rest if the team, you can't compare Scholes with Barkley simply just look at the players he had around him.Scholes was world class at 22 Friend.
Scholes played as a striker!
Plus you have to take into account the teams they were playing in.
Scholes and Gerrard were in multi-trophy winning teams playing alongside top quality players.
Ross also plays a more attacking role than those players and doesn't contribute defensively as much as those players did. A more suitable comparison in role/generation would be Raheem Sterling 132 apps/ 28 Goals /18 Assists/ 46 combined at 21 years old. I thought he was terrible at Liverpool and last season at City but watching a few City games this season he has stepped up another level where Ross has gone backwards.
Ross 120 apps/17goals/11 assists combined 28Would be interesting to compare Barkleys record to Sterlings stats, can anyone get them ?