I think we can lay that issue's blame squarely at the feet of Bill "what a manager!" Kenwright.Just for the record I have no issue at all with Martinez seeking his full contractual entitlement. My issue is with those that agreed such terms from Everton's side.
I think we can lay that issue's blame squarely at the feet of Bill "what a manager!" Kenwright.
He's not an unlikable person, but he is egregiously disingenuous
....^^^ deserved more attention than it got.After the very pro-Bill briefing in the Sunday Mirror last week, do you think that some form of revenge has been exacted by someone at the club in this story in the Daily Mail?
To be fair, and certainly from a shareholder's perspective it's a collective failure of the board, the executive and legal teams to negotiate, draft and sign off a contract which in the face of it appears not to penalise the manager's early termination of contract through poor performance.
If it was entirely BK's responsibility then there's an even great corporate governance issue at stake.
Or, maybe, don't promise to pay out the remainder of the contract if it is terminated early. Add in performance related clauses that increase entitlement to a higher salary. Include minimum performance clauses to allow to get rid if not performing over x amount of games.
There are many things that are more attractive to use in the contract than a rolling one year contract, or a iron-clad 5 year contract with no 'get out of jail' clauses.
Still absolutely no evidence that this Mail/S*n story is true.
The club have said nothing and no reputable source has.
File under 'nonsense that serves a bigger purpose'....unless, of course, the Mail and S*n are our go to sources for the truth now?