I've already explained that you're mistaken if you think that I think a football club wouldn't take a calculated risk. I said that a club wouldn't take a risk if it was obviously illegal and to the detriment of that club.
OK, well, as I've said, clubs are happy to do stuff that is illegal like poaching players, which is obviously illegal. The courts can't penalise SU, and the FA have no history of penalising clubs except when it's 100% they were dishonest, so there's not much possible detriment to the club. The upside is pretty huge though - £2m are we talking - so I really don't think it would be to the detriment of the club.
Oh, I remember the other thing I forgot to say earlier on FA fines. The FA can only act if Everton report them, and Everton can take back the report at any time (Spurs did this with Chelsea over Frank Arnesen). So in the event that the FA were going to impose a huge fine (which goes against all history of FA action), SU could cave in at that point and have Everton retract the report.
As explained, SU, assuming they have done what we're wasting hours on arguing about, presumably feel that a case is unlikely to be made against them.
I think our positions are just 3 words different

I just think you are giving too much weight to the legal positions (whether it's enforceable in court), and not enough to the likelehood of each outcome (most of which don't involve a court).
Bedtime.











