Interesting Danny, it looks like you're correct. From what I gather, numbers are usually considered to be merely "notions of counting", rather than abstract realities. Now there will be a counter-argument as to whether a number can indeed be an abstract reality, but I've not got the inclination to search that argument out.
Anyway, zero itself is highly abstract in that it stands for nothing. But it's representative of a set containing nothing. For example, 5 pebbles = 5 cows. The number 5 is an abstractation from all collections containing 5 actual things; that is, from sets of things which number 5 (5 dogs, 5 cats, 5 pretty girls, etc).
Therefore, zero represents that set which is filled with nothing. It is the count of the elements of a completely empty set.
Freaky really. I'm a bit suspicious of the view, although it holds a lot of importance in mathematics and science. To me, although numbers are abstract in the sense that they only exist if things exist, zero, or nothingness, doesn't describe anything other than a lack of something, which isn't a count as such. But clearly I'm wrong, so I'll bow to popular pressure and accept that fact.
But is minus-2 a number?