The Cowboy
Player Valuation: £60m
Any reason why we cannot replace the roof on Bullens/Gwladys/Main Stand to be cantilevered like the Park End? Would relieve some if not all of the obstructed views problems.
Any reason why we cannot replace the roof on Bullens/Gwladys/Main Stand to be cantilevered like the Park End? Would relieve some if not all of the obstructed views problems.
When I was a kid use to get the bus from Page Moss get off at Lower Breck Rd then walk down to the ground, as you crossed onto priory road you could see the old pylon floodlights and the park end of the ground. As you got closer and the effect of the 4 pylons came into play as a kid it seemed to light up the whole sky. Night matches under them lights was magical.When you drive past Stanley park and Goodison is in front of you, that view is brilliant
That stadium costs were an estimated $430M (~£260M) with $300MM (~£182M) in public financing (county bonds). A football stadium in Liverpool should cost less, but how much public financing is being provided? It's hard to compare stadium development between the two areas because so much US-based stadium development is publicly financed.
A redeveloped Goodison would be my choice but that's defo not going to happen, so it has to be a shiny new stadium near the city centre
It'll be a jarg 'Rolex' knowing our board.
Well, we are skint anyway so the money side of it means well stay in GP anyway but think what we could have if we had the owners whoc had the vision and money to make ideas like the Seahwaks ground happen and identify it with the fan base.
It,s a them and us situation with them skint.
The Seahawks ground, like most American stadiums, was paid for by Seattle taxpayers at the risk of the team moving away(not sure if it was an explicit threat, but there is always an implicit threat).Well, we are skint anyway so the money side of it means well stay in GP anyway but think what we could have if we had the owners whoc had the vision and money to make ideas like the Seahwaks ground happen and identify it with the fan base.
It,s a them and us situation with them skint.
The Seahawks ground, like most American stadiums, was paid for by Seattle taxpayers at the risk of the team moving away(not sure if it was an explicit threat, but there is always an implicit threat).
That's how we do it, we hold cities hostage and if they don't pay up we move to a city that will.
Don't think that would fly in the UK, but it's what allows American stadiums to be the temples of excess that they are.
Don't disagree that a new stadium could be marvelous, but the point is that the county carried the burden of the development of the Seattle stadium. Let's not miss the fact that it is home to three teams. If you're comparing apples to apples, let's talk about a Merseyside-financed shared stadium. I'll admit a fair amount of ignorance on new stadium development in the UK, but aren't publicly-financed deals rather rare?