It's not you know. I've been called 'sub-human'.
Technically, you haven't.
I recall it was someone saying "You have to be human first...."

It's not you know. I've been called 'sub-human'.

Technically, you haven't.
I recall it was someone saying "You have to be human first...."![]()
Maybe you should check the DK pictures again if you think they look anything like those images.
.im a bit behind the times , but thanks to whoever posted that video link about the redeveloped goodison. i found it really interesting (they say its sustainable etc etc but is it affordable ? and how will the club fund it ? it leaves lots of questions still left unanswered imo ).
i have got a query though. a few pages back there are pictures from keioc and co of the view from residents houses of the new stadium in kirkby.these pictures were used to show that kirkby is not a good idea.
well if thats the case , then what is the view gonna be like from the nearest houses to the 'redeveloped' goodison ?(ps i think the stadium looks crap btw)
surely the argument used that the view ruins it for kirkby residents is even more of a case with these 'redeveloped' goodison plans as the houses are even nearer the stadium ?
have keioc done a comparison pic's of views from the nearest residents houses in all the 3 locations mentioned ?
Funding: it's all in the KEIOC evidence to the public inquiry...
6.1.2 Whilst the technical and design aspects can be explained by Trevor Skempton the funding of either a redevelopment or a new build site can be achieved through non-retail based enabling and the utilization of an innovative financial product designed for stadium project funding, Equity Seat Right
6.1.3 The funding options (for a redeveloped Goodison):Source
ESR Funding £110M
Securitisation of New Stadium Naming Rights £25M
Sale of Bellefield £4M
Long Term or Syndicated Debt £19M
Equity Funding £30M
Supporters Trust fund £25M
As for homes around Goodison: KRAG were the body objecting on behalf of residents at Kirkby, not KEIOC.
Total
As
As£220