exactly. how can anyone complain at them figures?
I don't think anyone will complain too much about the figures, but if we operate on a profit for this and the next window the complaints will right fly at the board
exactly. how can anyone complain at them figures?
we need to spend now tbh, its false economy to save when saving will see us slip down the league thus losing revenue from improved league position, and possibly a huge payment for europe, oh well two days to go and we will see where the ambition truly lies
I'd say including everything. Right now we're plus thirty.
By end next summer. We'll be plus 40m.
Unless martinez begins acquiring people before then
Bear in mind we brought in a few players last summer. Plus martinez compensation.
We're still net positive though.
By this summer he'll certainly have a warchest
We've got to be careful with it though.
Not turn into Villa or Westham or Newcastle.
Cleverer than them
please define war chest
Released today:
http://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/64652-We-don-t-need-to-strengthen
Anyone with a better monetary brain than me able to do some bullet points?
Cheers
Can people stop hiding behind this debt repayment excuse now?
We have made a profit before player sales, and these accounts do not include the massive increase in revenue from the new TV deal. Debt is not a problem.
There really aught to be plenty of money available.
We are flush with cash! Bill and his cronies are hiding it in a slush fund!
<insert other ludicrous theory here>
Tamworth's net spend.
wrong mate, the net profit swing is the difference between one years loss and the next years profit, as in we lost 9.1m the year before and made a profit of 1.6 the following year, = 10.7m profit swing so total of 1.6m made - still would mean that with trades of players this year we'd be sat around the 20m mark
Kenwright wins, the fans lose. Same old.