So I assume your saying if we would have replaced Moyes that a new Manager would have been given more money to spend?
I assume this is what you are implying?
I will wait for an answer before I retort.
- Status
So I assume your saying if we would have replaced Moyes that a new Manager would have been given more money to spend?
I assume this is what you are implying?
I will wait for an answer before I retort.
electricblue
Player Valuation: £35m
Read my posts properly before you tell me what i'm doing lad. There's a good boy.
This same guy defends the board at every opportunity. It should be no surprise.
Dell Boy
Player Valuation: £35m
Loving the bold type big man. Loving it.
No that's not what I'm saying.
The ginger one has spent £140 million. With no pressure whatsoever. We finished 17th - he kept his job. Scene set. He's one of the best paid managers in the world. He has complete control. More than any other manager at a decent sized club.
The net spend figure of other clubs is massively distorted by their constant upheaval of managers. Spurs and the sh*te are two great examples of new managers bringing in whole new regimes and a shedload of big money buys then getting shown the exit.
Go on RETORT away lid!
Dell Boy
Player Valuation: £35m
No I don't sweetheart. I think the board have messed up Moyes contract situation and should have said sign or go at the end of last season. I think the board's refusal to hold proper shareholder meetings is terrible. I also hold the board 50:50 with Moyes himself for the farce that was our transfer window. There are loads of other issues I've come out against the board as well.
And if he had continued to finish 17th he would have been sacked, a long, long time ago, so im not quite sure you felt the need to highlight that point.
And yes your very correct, the RS are the best example you could have used, they have outspent us every Season for the last 11 Years, in terms of Net and in terms of wages, but they have had a succession of utter tosh Managers.
Hence them being quite tosh.
So your right in a way, net spend isnt the biggest factor, its a mixture of net spend, wages and the right Manager.
But its a mixture of them all.
I see you ignored the post which pointed out that you didn't read properly.
I said net spend and wages combined. Incase you missed it.
Spot on mate. Agree with most of it. He's had the squads to do better than he has. I think he also has the mentality that we just are t good enough. Or Liverpool are a better team than us (for example). You can't have that mentality if you want to win things.
Him coming out saying we're playing at are limits etc doesn't pump belief into the players. If he told them they are the best in the league and teams will struggle to defeat then it gives belief. If your manager constantly tells you your 6th best You'll start to believe it. I don't know what he tells them. But I see what he says to the media and it's negative.
Net spend league means nothing.
Dell Boy
Player Valuation: £35m
Agreed. I was mainly just trying to make a point that simply looking at net spend ignores the pretty obvious fact that longevity should guarentee lower than average net spending.
Look I think Moyes has done a good job for us overall. He's stablilised the ship whereas another clown at that time could have got us relegated and seen us become a bloody Notts Forest or Sheffield Wednesday.
It's time to go now and the sooner he goes before he says even more condescending ****
It clearly does though.
If you can't buy players without first selling players it's clearly going to impact your ability to build a squad.
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
