Spurs were managed by Ramos when they won the league cup weren't they?
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Ah I stand corrected. Ok, there's a guy that led Spurs to their worst ever start to a league season after their cup win, with just 2 points from the first 8 games.
He had a good half season at Real, before doing not much in Russia and Ukraine. I think I'm right in saying he hasn't won a trophy since that League Cup.
Yeah, it's a shame what happened to him. That Seville side he built was probably the best in their history.
It was a good one. As they say on the stock market though, past performance is no indication of future success. Quite often managers are simply in the right place at the right time. Far easier to have success in one place than replicate it in another.
Yeah, it's a shame what happened to him. That Seville side he built was probably the best in their history.
That`s a truth with modifications though. That very good Sevillateam was built by their chairman and Caparrós. Juande Ramos just took over an already built team and were there for only two seasons if I remember correctly.
That's the Liverpool way not the Everton way ladhe will sign a 40 year old rooney back from utd for 25 mil, who will end up going on a 40 game scoreless run and getting us relegated
kenwright will have sold the club by then to thai businessman suckidong longtime who will spend his cash in x in the city and end up dying from a heroine overdose in the pleasure rooms.
His only son Doyou Likadikaday will take over control of the club however he is only 12 years old and doesnt speak any english so decides to sack everybody and turn Goodison Park into a circus.
Not sure I agree with that. We've won plenty of games when playing badly. All those 1-0 results are hardly a sign of a manager and team that can't win ugly. If anything it's the lack of champagne football we've been lacking.
For what it's worth I can't see him at a Man City type club either, because these kind of clubs generally buy their way to quick results rather than investing in the long-term. I don't think that's the right approach, and it's clearly not an approach that would suit Moyes well.
I just think it's sad that his lack of trophies are used as a stick to bash the man with. To win a cup you need to win maybe 6/7 games. To finish high up in the league takes 38. I know which I'd hold in higher esteem, and it's a fact that no club has consistently out done us during the Moyes era without spending vastly more than we've had available.
Sure teams like Portsmouth or Birmingham have sneaked a trophy but you'd think this was a regular occurence the way some carry on. If you look at the winners of the FA Cup since we won it in 95:
Man Utd - 3 times
Chelsea - 6 times
Arsenal - 4 times
Liverpool - Twice
Man City - once
Pompey - once
Hardly open season is it and you have to remember that Portsmouth had to beat Cardiff in their final, not Chelsea.
Even the League Cup, since Moyes was appointed, the only shock winners (ie outside the traditional big 4) have been Boro, Birmingham and Spurs.
The fact that Boro, Birmingham and Portsmouth are now outside of the top flight should be enough to show how risky it is to gamble all on a fluke cup win.
Yeah cause the boards at other clubs don't know the constraints he is forced to work under and only pay attention to trophies.
