He's really not very good as a right back. Not sustainable playing him there week in week out.

We desperately needed a striker too. If we’d have spent a few quid on a RB instead of a striker there’d be uproar.
Barry though has turned out to be a massive gamble and whilst he’s young he’s certainly showing he’s nowhere near ready to lead the line of a top half team.
Plus a right winger, a defensive mid and a forward. We wasted £12 million on Grealish, which should have gone on a starting right winger not Dibling. The Barry deal doesn't look great at the minute either, but still too early to fully judge, we'll see at the end of the season.We needed two good fullbacks last June - yet we blew it all on Barry ?
Barry will never step up ..Plus a right winger, a defensive mid and a forward. We wasted £12 million on Grealish, which should have gone on a starting right winger not Dibling. The Barry deal doesn't look great at the minute either, but still too early to fully judge, we'll see at the end of the season.
Enough of the Barry fee to buy a RB and a goal scoring striker? I don’t think we did or it would have been done.He had enough to buy both...
I think that works if you’re just filling in for a game or whatever, but he has effectively been our first choice back for 12 months and has played 99% of his PL games there so you sort of have to treat him the same as anyone else. Obviously it’s not his fault that he’s not very good there, but it wasn’t Brett angell’s fault he was crap either, you just have to call it as you see it in that sense.He isn't a right back. When you remember that, it's hard to be critical at all. Would we be critical at all if Grealish was playing as a number 8?
So in order to preserve his reputation as a CB he should refuse to play at RB then?I think that works if you’re just filling in for a game or whatever, but he has effectively been our first choice back for 12 months and has played 99% of his PL games there so you sort of have to treat him the same as anyone else. Obviously it’s not his fault that he’s not very good there, but it wasn’t Brett angell’s fault he was crap either, you just have to call it as you see it in that sense.
Some of his worst play has been in the box.He isn't a right back. When you remember that, it's hard to be critical at all. Would we be critical at all if Grealish was playing as a number 8?
Thats a very strange take away from what I said. I’m just saying going along the lines of ‘you can’t criticise him because he’d rather not be playing there’ is a bit of a stretch when he’s playing right back every week. Like I said, nobody WANTS to be crap do they? So if it’s alright to criticise the others it has to be alright to criticise him too, they’re all doing their best but we comment on what they actually produce.So in order to preserve his reputation as a CB he should refuse to play at RB then?
Thats a very strange take away from what I said. I’m just saying going along the lines of ‘you can’t criticise him because he’d rather not be playing there’ is a bit of a stretch when he’s playing right back every week. Like I said, nobody WANTS to be crap do they? So if it’s alright to criticise the others it has to be alright to criticise him too, they’re all doing their best but we comment on what they actually produce.
I’ve not said otherwise? Like I’ve said - twice - I don’t ‘blame’ Beto for poor performances, or Keane, or mykolenko etc etc. None of them try to play poorly, I don’t see O’Brien any differently. He does his best at right back, it’s very possible that he would do better if he was a centre half, I don’t doubt it at all. But we can’t all just sit here and not pass comment on performances for the next couple of years if we keep playing him at right back can we?He's not a right back, he never asked to play there and aside from a spell last season where he looked OK he's looked like a fish out of water - the blame lies squarely at the feet of the recruitment team not JOB.