No mate. Im not getting into this with you, but it's clear to most people that Ilm on the money and you're a bit lost about matters concerning our onfield issues.You know absolutely nothing about football.
Stick to moaning about Naming Rights.
We can't play Garner at both RB and RW. Something has to give, and he seems integral as supporting CM. Considering a lot of forum accounts were coughing up that he was a bench player at best prior to the season start, he (Garner) suddenly seems essential in 3 starting positions.
Everton: Boggles the mind.
Thankfully the transfer window has shut, they'll have to wait until it opens again before signing him.Garner should be right back for Palace
Exactly this...... and hopefully if we ever see the wizard back fit, he could also fit into that cm position.Wouldn’t be against garner at rb , hall being moved into cm , jack as 10 , Illman on the left and dibbling on the right
If we were stretching for the win, Garner in at full back and Alcaraz in midfield would of been a positive changeHe has played every minute of every game and needed to be replaced.
At least 3 options in Coleman, Patterson and at a stretch Garner, could have swapped out for him.
He was poor and has been for a while