Everyone knows this, we didn’t though. He will play very little and can CAN be a good defender on his dayWe should have done it this season IMO ok![]()
No one else was coming here to sit in our bench and there’s none of the youth deemed ready
Everyone knows this, we didn’t though. He will play very little and can CAN be a good defender on his dayWe should have done it this season IMO ok![]()
You have just summed up we could have let him go purchased a better cb or still used him as a bargaining chip to get a better squad player!Everyone knows this, we didn’t though. He will play very little and can CAN be a good defender on his day
No one else was coming here to sit in our bench and there’s none of the youth deemed ready
No, he was the better option as was FREE, vastly experienced, settled, happy to be benched, reduced wage and on his day, a very good defender - name me any one else who ticks all those boxes…..You have just summed up we could have let him go purchased a better cb or still used him as a bargaining chip to get a better squad player!
He now could be used as a bargaining chip for a championship player - not rocket science!No, he was the better option as was FREE, vastly experienced, settled, happy to be benched, reduced wage and on his day, a very good defender - name me any one else who ticks all those boxes…..
As for bargaining chip….. he was out of contract
He’s just signed a new contract - he’s happy here, and we want him as cover for a yearHe now could be used as a bargaining chip for a championship player - not rocket science!
He may be happy but it was a very bad idea by DM !He’s just signed a new contract - he’s happy here, and we want him as cover for a year
Yes, but not one of them could think of any other player who covered all the same basesHe may be happy but it was a very bad idea by DM !
Many blues fans are fuming not just me !
He Keane us not worth a carrot no one was lined up to take him on & we offer him a lucrative contract = a bad ideaYes, but not one of them could think of any other player who covered all the same bases
So was the better option that ticked all the same boxes?He Keane us not worth a carrot no one was lined up to take him on & we offer him a lucrative contract = a bad idea
He ticked no boxes imo ok!So was the better option that ticked all the same boxes?
He wasn’t settled?He ticked no boxes imo ok!
Are you related by any chanceHe wasn’t settled?
Not having him would be better than having him. Playing literally anybody over him would cover the bases better. Playing with 10 would be better. The guy is a nervous liability who drops the confidence of all around him.Yes, but not one of them could think of any other player who covered all the same bases
That’s nonsenseNot having him would be better than having him. Playing literally anybody over him would cover the bases better. Playing with 10 would be better. The guy is a nervous liability who drops the confidence of all around him.