So.......you dont judge his play. You havent seen him play. You have no reason to believe he isnt good at those. I and everyone in the world knows stats dont tell the whole story about a player, but if you are going to come in and say a guy sucks, and ignore the actual verifiable statistical success he has had, you might want to provide SOME reason to believe. Otherwise its a logical fallacy to say "because stats sometimes dont show the truth, therefore stats for this guy dont show the truth". You are just being negative and contrary for the sake of being negative and contrary.
And if stats are so random, how come he gets double digit goals and assists every year? Is McNeils success random compared to Harrison? Is Ndiayes success random compared to Lindstrom? As everyone int he world knows there is variation from stats but theres a literal reason we keep it. Its a realllllly good indication someone is doing something successfully.