Telling we also offered a contract.
The club know it too.
They're right to not pay him the wages he's on now - we've got to grow beyond Doucoure and certainly not Doucoure as our highest earner.
But considering the amount of players we need, ideally I'd have liked him to stay a year or two but never on the wages he's on now.
We need numbers, the club know it, everyone knows it. The club has options now, however.
We need numbers, the club know it, everyone knows it. The club has options now, however.
Problem is, and the reality is - the club doesn't have infinite resource.
The more bodies we need, the more thinly transfer fees are spread.
You forgot to use 'Capitals' at the beginning of every paragraph. You're fired!if i got offered significantly more money it would change my life
a footballer who's played in the premier league for around 10 years and has had a 120k a week contract for five of them will not have their life changed if they're suddenly on 50-60k a week. the money they make is obscene and there's nothing more he can own or do that he couldn't already. i dont begrudge them earning the money btw. id rather the money went to a traditionally working class player who actually makes the game happen, than suits or executives.
also its a job that is related to your performance and ability to do it, his has massively declined.
if we're gonna try and compare it to normal life it's like if I used to be able to do 35 hours a week but now I can only do 20 and when I write an email every second word is spelt wrong
Signing a player is usually a gamble. You never know whether it’s going to work out. “The best” is, therefore, frequently dependent upon what a player does after signing.By the same token, we can't pay top dollar to anyone but the best, either.