Fully agreed we have wasted enough money, even in the period when we’ve had none.We're staying up, not too arsed about spaffing money right now on the next Tosun or Straq.
Joined up plan in the Summer when we know for sure what out of contract players we need to replace.
Wouldn't say no to another foreign loan like, if it became available.
I agreeTeams do spend money. You talk up spending £60m for Ancelotti on 3 players. It's part of the game. Bournemouth have spent £250m net the past couple of seasons. Villa £400m+ under Emery. Don't get me started on Forest, West Ham and Man Utd. Chelsea have spent more under Boehly than we have in our entire history.
My point is, the narrative around Everton's recruitment under Koeman as being the reason we've been on our arse is nowhere near the full picture. It's a con. A lazy narrative.
Split the years however you like 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, Everton are never near the front of spend. Often we're bottom 2. Sure, we've signed some crap - but that's football - so has every team. Read a Man Utd or West Ham forum...
The stadium, and a board who didn't anticipate Russia's war/Usmanov's taps off is biggest factor and they never get mentioned.
[Edit] Just realised I'm a bit off topic here. BUY PLAYERS EVERTON FFS.
Lee TrundleYeah another good one. Robert earnshaw?
How long for though. He just has a body that attracts injuries.Feels naive at best to expect him to stay fit, even when back.
Teams do spend money. You talk up spending £60m for Ancelotti on 3 players. It's part of the game. Bournemouth have spent £250m net the past couple of seasons. Villa £400m+ under Emery. Don't get me started on Forest, West Ham and Man Utd. Chelsea have spent more under Boehly than we have in our entire history.
My point is, the narrative around Everton's recruitment under Koeman as being the reason we've been on our arse is nowhere near the full picture. It's a con. A lazy narrative.
Split the years however you like 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, Everton are never near the front of spend. Often we're bottom 2. Sure, we've signed some crap - but that's football - so has every team. Read a Man Utd or West Ham forum...
The stadium, and a board who didn't anticipate Russia's war/Usmanov's taps off is biggest factor and they never get mentioned.
[Edit] Just realised I'm a bit off topic here. BUY PLAYERS EVERTON FFS.
Well that was a much more eloquent way of saying what I said a few post back.@davek entire argument is that Dyche was hamstrung by poor ownership and no funds leaving him with a poor squad - therefore he had to grind out results, keep us relegation free and wait for the summer when we can offload low contribution players for quality and that the manager was doing a good job.
His argument now (and he's either being contrary for contrarian sake or he's a flat out moron) is that despite being 9 points better off and having a good buffer between us and the teams below us (having won as many games under a new manager in 4 matches as the previous manager managed in 19) we are having our expectations lowered and we now apparently:
Need the players we were waiting to offload in the summer
Have had our expectations lowered
The new owners should be spending big now and not wait until the summer
Don't try and search for logic, there isn't any.

Cant comment on that any more I got a warning for inappropriate behavior.. I'm so sorry mods it wont happen again.Ah the County Tipperary homemade delicacy amongst families there
He wouldn’t last a week in training, Tarkowski would do him straight away.Can't we just call Maupay back from loan we are low on forwards.. Be like a new signing him.
Dont you dare jinx this nowSpurs sniffing around Alcarez?
What is the percentage now?We know that isn't true though - the wages we spent relative to our turnover was horrendous. In 19/20, 20/21, 21/22 it was 89%, 95%, 90% - that's an insanely high amount for a club that was also building a new stadium at the same time almost purely out of owner funding! 2nd highest in the Prem I believe. I don't think two or three successful signings would have transformed the situation - you're looking at a bigger number than that I think.
I agree though - the bigger problem is spending on [Poor language removed] rather than spending full stop - which is why I'm pleased we haven't gone out and panic bought a striker like many were pining for before Beto's brace on Saturday
It would be complete negligence to come out of this window with just 1 fit striker... I agree with not panic buying but we are in a situation where we need to get someone in.We know that isn't true though - the wages we spent relative to our turnover was horrendous. In 19/20, 20/21, 21/22 it was 89%, 95%, 90% - that's an insanely high amount for a club that was also building a new stadium at the same time almost purely out of owner funding! 2nd highest in the Prem I believe. I don't think two or three successful signings would have transformed the situation - you're looking at a bigger number than that I think.
I agree though - the bigger problem is spending on [Poor language removed] rather than spending full stop - which is why I'm pleased we haven't gone out and panic bought a striker like many were pining for before Beto's brace on Saturday
Can't be dealing with this happy relaxed Goodison it just seems weird. Bring back Maups and bring back the venom I sayCan't we just call Maupay back from loan we are low on forwards.. Be like a new signing him.
Its just Alcaraz announcement isnt it and then lots of handwringing - 'difficult market','we tried', 'hard to get it over the line', etc....
