6 + 2 Point Deductions

[paulf]

I'm pretty bored of everybody just shouting OI, RS every time somebody disagrees. It really doesn't help with any conversations. Bit Salem witch trial tbh.

If they were a RS coming on here to wind us up, calling them a RS isn't the zinger you think it is. If they're not a RS though, it's a pretty harsh judgement. Seems wierd to say things that woudl hurt an Evertonian more, on an Everton website.

So you think the guy/s in question are misunderstood Evertonians ? Bed

 

[PhilEFC]

Missed anything today lads? Have we got any closer to getting our points back?

 

[Iana]

Well for one people would think West Ham had done something illegal.

The point is that you have provided absolutely no evidence that the whistleblower acted in bad faith. Yet you are then using it as a justification as to why he shouldn't be part of the commission. It is clutching at straws.

Like playing an illegible player(s) and scoring vital goals that enabled them to stay up at someone else’s expense and pleaded for a financial sanction for their misdemeanour.
As a minimum he should be arguing for the same based on precedent and not show he is compromised…what’s so hard to understand about that?

 

[gwladysnight]

It was an illegal transfer under the breach of PL third party ownership.

I quite clearly stated in the first post about nick igoe wether he was fit and proper to be sitting on an independent panel given he was at the club at the time of these errors. Its enough for me to question his validity to be sitting in judgement of another club now. I dont need evidence to say wether he prompted blowing the whistle before the knock at the door came as thats just opinion.
What isnt opinion is didnt do the job correctly. And shouldnt be sitting in judgement on another premier league club.

He wasn't involved in the transfers. It was deputy Chief exec Scott Duxbury and Club solicitor Graham Shear who hid the existence of offshore companies holding the thirty-party rights over Tevez and Mascherano.

Financial Directors are not involved in transfers they oversee the business side of a football club, so there is no evidence that he didn't do his job properly.

 

[Joey66]

Can’t help but laugh at the irony of us being called cheats by the RS,oh the actual irony

Yes pity they were not banned from Europe for ten years alone back in the 1980s ..... no every club had to pay the price us more than anyone at that time .....

 

[PhilEFC]

He wasn't involved in the transfers. It was deputy Chief exec Scott Duxbury and Club solicitor Graham Shear who hid the existence of offshore companies holding the thirty-party rights over Tevez and Mascherano.

Financial Directors are not involved in transfers they oversee the business side of a football club, so there is no evidence that he didn't do his job properly.

Turn it in mate.

 

[gwladysnight]

Like playing an illegible player(s) and scoring vital goals that enabled them to stay up at someone else’s expense and pleaded for a financial sanction for their misdemeanour.
As a minimum he should be arguing for the same based on precedent and not show he is compromised…what’s so hard to understand about that?

His only involvement in the Tevez case was blowing the whistle on Duxbury and Shear. You seem to have a strange idea of the role and responsibility of a financial Director at a Premier League club.

 

[Blast_of_Cannock]

Missed anything today lads? Have we got any closer to getting our points back?

VAR still checking...

 

[arch stanton]

why are you ignoring the value of those sold?

and they're normally so on top of net spend

 

[Lob]

Swearing at football matches eh. What next.

 

[malfosse]

I am against people lashing out with absolutely no evidence.

I am against people parroting inaccuracies just because they have seen them on social media.

I am against people repeating crazy conspiracy theories that have been debunked again and again.

Above all I am against people who haven't even bothered to read the judgement.

Watch you don't fall of that high horse, you mewling quim..

 

[kenada_blue]

He was actually on our side…..

I don't read any of the garbage he puts up now the hobbit faced minge

 

[Clarky cat]

His only involvement in the Tevez case was blowing the whistle on Duxbury and Shear. You seem to have a strange idea of the role and responsibility of a financial Director at a Premier League club.

Is Everton your first or second team? I’m generally curious as your posting style is reminiscent to another poster who went under another moniker and had an unrelenting hard-on for Everton’s finances.

 

[Iana]

He wasn't involved in the transfers. It was deputy Chief exec Scott Duxbury and Club solicitor Graham Shear who hid the existence of offshore companies holding the thirty-party rights over Tevez and Mascherano.

Financial Directors are not involved in transfers they oversee the business side of a football club, so there is no evidence that he didn't do his job properly.

So the FInance Director of a multi-million pound turnover business never once asked why they/he was paying a company in an off-shore tax haven that he had never dealt with before and never asked for an explanation.
If that’s what you want to believe then the whole West Ham corporate governance of FDs not agreeing to sign off of millions of pounds seems ripe for corruption!

 

[kenada_blue]

I am against people lashing out with absolutely no evidence.

I am against people parroting inaccuracies just because they have seen them on social media.

I am against people repeating crazy conspiracy theories that have been debunked again and again.

Above all I am against people who haven't even bothered to read the judgement.

You're the only one on that horse though Rick.