Wingers and corners are so 2014
POW!
Forum nobodies...this is how you do a first reply.
Charming. The People's Club but the "somebodies" forum.
Agreed. It's a good post mate and you're actually spot on.
I had you down as a forum B lister. Be careful.
God i miss him.'Sire, the peasants are getting ideas above their station....'
![]()
For me a winger is a player who, as you say, can beat a man from a standing start, or who 'hugs' the wing, receives the ball, and either has the pace or skill to beat his man. The most important factor in being a winger is to cross a ball effectively :Maybe we should start calling them inside forwards rather than wingers. No top team really plays with a proper wingers today.
The problem is that Barkley and Naismith don't have the ability to beat someone from a standing start. Naismith's passing isn't very good and Barkley and Mirallas have been poor this year.
The rest are too wasteful which is dangerous for a team that likes to dominate possession and they also don't contribute enough in terms of goals and assists.
We're really missing Deulofeu, Pienaar and Osman who where big players for us last season.
People mean players that are comfortable and effective out wide when they say 'wingers', which is why they're correct about us needing two of them.
City wouldn't play Jovetic or Toure out wide, and they're far more comparable to Naismith and Barkley than the likes of Silva or Nasri are.
The way the front four is being set up at the moment is absolutely garbage.