So Leicester are 3rd having just beaten Southampton away by 9 goals. They, like us, have invested in many young players.
So what makes them better than us?
Why aren't we up there like them?
They built their team around Vardy, and built their team to work to his strengths, pace, directness, counter-attacking. We've just kind of made a Frankenstein of a team, a bit like United, in the sense that we've built with the best players available, but will they compliment each other? Are they actually just cast offs?
We've signed players like Richarlison, Bernard, Iwobi and Walcott, who rely on their pace, but their creativity is Sigurdsson who is slow, uninispiring and holds us back. What we need to do is sign a proper striker and build round him.
I do feel Leicester have fell into a little purple patch, like we had 10-years ago, with cheap, but smart signings like Tielemans, Maddison, Evans and Soyuncu. But they've had players like Barnes and Chilwell come through. I'm not saying Leicester are going to win the league, but look how they approach things, and look how we approach things. When i mentioned Cast Offs before... Maddison, Soyuncu, Ndidi, Praet and Riccardo are all players who were stars for their team, who Leicester took. Digne, Gomes, Mina, Walcott, Schneiderlin and Iwobi? By contrast...