thebluefox
Player Valuation: £50m
fulham A norwich H norwich A .7 POINTS FFS CLEAR 3RD
What Tree said. If we'd drawn all those games we would have 'picked up points in 13 games out of 15 against lesser teams'. Hardly a glowing testimony is it? And we should be expecting to to pick up points in all those games as a minimum. From those 13 games we picked up 23 points. Extrapolate that to the number of games we've played and we'd be on 58, 2 pts ahead. So we'd have to do exactly as well against the rest of the league as against the bottom 7 to maintain that pace. 'FFS Moyes'?? To F-ing right!
As regards points we've dropped due to refereeing errors etc, has anyone been on/remember that site that use to produce a league table "how it should be" adjusting for wrong decisions etc?
So this 'what went wrong' thread is not where we are not allowed to say what went wrong then? I put it to you that in all those games we lost valuable points beacuse of the ref. We only needed a couple and we'd be up there.
Those decisions were wrong. There are posts in this thread highlighting the Newcastle game as one we should of won but in the context of we were not good enough.. We hammered them and scored 4 legit goals. I thought that was worth mentioning and put the rest up at the same time.
Also I would have to say expecting to get points from 15 out of 15 games is more of a testement to your expectations of Moyes than him as a manager.
Oh, I'm not disagreeing with you on your first point. I was just saying there used to be a site which produced an alternative table which took such things into account.
Regards the second point, I consider it a testament to the current team and our position in the league that we should be getting points from all those games, and that is something that is due to his ability to build a strong squad on a meagre budget. That we haven't done so it due to his inability to maximise said squad on a regular enough basis for me.
Edit: Did a quick google on the first point. Don't think it's the same site I remember, but something similar: http://www.debatabledecisions.com/english-premier-league-tables. Looks to be a couple weeks out of date.
Them challenges were a disgrace from the little rat, no doubt we would have won that if Mirallas stayed on.
The things is though, he gets away with most things now after his ban last year. It's almost as if he's protected no matter what he does.I was just about to highlight these 2 myself. Poor reffing decisions happen all year both for and against and yes I do think we get more against than many other teams. But these 2 above by that **** have no place in the game and it isn't just us. He has no shame in going around attempting to maim opposition players. I said last year that I hoped someone ended his career and was actually personally threatened by cult members who I don't even know. how can you defend that let alone his biting and racist misdameanors!
The things is though, he gets away with most things now after his ban last year. It's almost as if he's protected no matter what he does.
I cannot believe he is on the shortlist for PFA and Baines isn't. I would vote for Titus Bramble ahead of this cat. You can have all the talent in the world but if you demonstrate no sprting behaviour you do not deserve a second of recognition.