Anyone fancy a laugh? Thought i'd post this from another forum in post on. Its an delusional rs fan (in bold text) replying to a West Ham fan.:
"What straws am I clutching at? I read certain papers. Within those papers, they seem to have lots of Liverpool fans with laptops and they do not seem to get negative press in the way other teams do.
Journalists with laptops eh? The bastards. The Times and the Guardian just report the truth and fair and accurate analysis. Perhaps it's your biases that lead you to expect and want negative press for Liverpool. Every other club gets fair press in those papers. There's rarely undue negativity or scaremongering in papers like that.
I've watched Liverpool pretty much every time they're on TV because we watch a large percentage of whatever is on in my house. I've been distinctly unimpressed. I cannot comment on the relative bias of Andy Gray becayse I barely listen to him now due to his anti-referee stance.
All the pundits on Sky are fiercely anti-Liverpool, and anti-Benitez, not just Andy Gray. Soccer Saturday is one big Liverpool-ripping session, Thommo is treated as the laughing stock and whipping boy. Merson, Le Tissier and Nicholas despise Liverpool just as much as you do. If you can't understand why the team that outplayed and beat Chelsea and United are top of the league, then I really can't help you.
An Everton fan was accusing the papers of sweeping despicable Liverpool chanting under the carpet, while other papers are sensationalising a chant which brings the paternity of Gerrard's kid into question. That's selective reporting at best.
Not to excuse those chants, because I hate all that [Poor language removed], but the ones about Lescott and Carsley are only ever chanted to drown out the Gerrard chants, and were only ever created for that reason. And it's not selective reporting at all. It was an article about Gerrard, so he mentioned the stick he gets. It wasn't an article about Lescott or Carsley or the chants at Merseyside derbies.
I'm not the only person I've ever met who think the media are pro-Liverpool. Maybe it's a London thing but if I brought up this subject with every hardcore football fan I know, they'd all say the same thing - the majority of the media fawn all over Liverpool. I watch Match of the Day every week. Could you accuse Hansen and Lawrenson of being anti-Liverpool?
Yep. Hansen's a United fan, Lawrenson is constantly critical of all the old dinosaur Benitez bugbears, zonal marking, rotation and all that [Poor language removed]. The majority of the media are pro-United, Ferguson and Wenger, and Sky are pro-Chelsea. Maybe your friends would say the same thing, but they're probably all bitter Hammers too.
I know you're upset that your entire team's getting sold off, but can you take it out on your owners instead of Liverpool. We're not to blame."