VAR

[trueblue84]

I may be wrong but I think that is a count involving only the decisions that went to VAR. How about all those that VAR hardly addressed to any degree yet we were all puzzled as to why not when we have had the chance to look at the match film. And anyway, presumably in its assessment of offside incidents SKY was taking as gospel that the VAR line across the pitch was representing exactly when the ball was played forward even though it's accepted by everyone that the line's position will invariably be inaccurate, however small the error.

Yes, only decisions that went to var. That highlights that human decision is still the problem. The only way I could see that being sorted would be to go down the NFL/tennis route, where teams have a number of challenges. That would take away any accusation of bias.

For where the point of play is decided, I mentioned before that while it is still open to human error, it is supported by technology and therefore the margins of error become smaller. Just because it isn't perfect, doesn't mean it should be scrapped. Going from ~70% accuracy to >90% accuracy can only be a good thing.