"undisclosed fee"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Im just watching the sland v boro game and our old kid Jutkjewicz is playing for Boro. We sent him to Coventry after years of moulding him into a player that never properly made the first team, we signed him for £1m then sent him on loan to three clubs, we then sold him for you guessed it an "undisclosed fee" on a three year contract. Now within that three year contract he has signed for Boro for £1.3m. So I know it wont be a great deal of money, but for Everton money is money does anyone know if we had a sell on clause or was this another "fail" by Everton?
 

bainesontoast said:
[video=youtube;jWl4vLKi2Do]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWl4vLKi2Do&feature=player_embedded[/video]
Click to expand...
th_1199743000374.gif


:( :( :( :( :( :( :(
 
ijjysmith said:
Yeah you can.

If Moyes had spent £500k on Bily it still would have proved to be a mistake.

You can judge the managers skill in the transfer market by if the Ayer is actually any good.
Click to expand...

Hmmm.

I think your wrong.

Andy Carroll on a free would be considered a useful squad player. At £35m it's disastrous.

The fee plays a massive part in forming an opinion on a clubs manager.
 

GrandOldTeam said:
Hmmm.

I think your wrong.

Andy Carroll on a free would be considered a useful squad player. At £35m it's disastrous.

The fee plays a massive part in forming an opinion on a clubs manager.
Click to expand...

I'm not saying the fee doesn't help judge the manager. Of course it does.

But you asked if all fees were undisclosed how would we judge the manager. It would be left to if the player was any good.

I don't ever think the club should have to tell us the fee for a player. Just my opinion.

Like most people I prefer it if they did, but we're not in charge are we?
 
GraemeS1980 said:
Im just watching the sland v boro game and our old kid Jutkjewicz is playing for Boro. We sent him to Coventry after years of moulding him into a player that never properly made the first team, we signed him for £1m then sent him on loan to three clubs, we then sold him for you guessed it an "undisclosed fee" on a three year contract. Now within that three year contract he has signed for Boro for £1.3m. So I know it wont be a great deal of money, but for Everton money is money does anyone know if we had a sell on clause or was this another "fail" by Everton?
Click to expand...

He was never going to make it at Goodison. There were huge concerns over his fitness, loan after loan and the reports back were the same. Great finisher, not looking like he's going to get fit enough.

Cov were forced into a corner at the start of the season when he was their only striker. Fair play to him though, persistent game time has cleared the fitness monkey off his back and he started scoring the goals.

I'm intrigued about the potential sell-on percentage. It's feasible that if we had one, it would have cleared the funds necessary to action Darron Gibson's transfer given the timing of both deals.
 
davek said:
I'm just glad Bill was there to work tirelessly to get the best deal for Everton. He might not have invested a penny in players but he's a beast in negotiating top dollar for the sale of assets in blue jerseys.
Click to expand...

Is this davek praising Kenwrong? I'm going to have to stand outside a second.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top