The Transfer Threads Poll

Which is better ?


  • Total voters
    116
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
To be honest the current two-thread solution is marginally better than the complete load of bilge in previous summers where some members just shut up shop and deserted.

However I don't see any problem with a 'one-strike-and-you're-out' approach (until the end of the window) to the serious transfer thread. There is still the random transfer speculation thread for people to broadcast whatever they want so it's not like anybody is getting censored. And for anyone over-impressed with their own humour or rumours there is the rest of the forum to play in.

Spot on this.
However , some of the egotists on the forum can't cope with the fact that their views aren't relevant to the credible thread and feel affronted that they're asked to post their views in tne speculation thread

TL;DR ?

Small penises are the cause of the problem
 

Lets get one thing straight. I don't go in those threads. EVER. I haven't read a single post in either of them nor do I have any intention of.

My point was don't go in them, post complete garbage, get thread banned, then moan about it. From previous seasons I know you like to indulge in whimsical fantasy formations or signings, despite the fact it's all bollox.

Please spare us your indignation at being banned from them. You post bollox=thread ban. You always did enjoy posting bollox.

If you don't like how the forum is moderated koff elsewhere and post bullsh1t to your hearts content.

Spot on this.
However , some of the egotists on the forum can't cope with the fact that their views aren't relevant to the credible thread and feel affronted that they're asked to post their views in tne speculation thread

TL;DR ?

Small penises are the cause of the problem

That's brutal Jim. There'll be lengthy ban for sure.

Speed bowler bowled a true line and smashed the outside stump clean out of the wicket. Umpire rightfully points and he's gone, the the poor batsman just had the spin bowler clothesline him before he made the pavilion.

Never seen anything like it Jim, high drama.
 
Lets get one thing straight. I don't go in those threads. EVER. I haven't read a single post in either of them nor do I have any intention of.

My point was don't go in them, post complete garbage, get thread banned, then moan about it. From previous seasons I know you like to indulge in whimsical fantasy formations or signings, despite the fact it's all bollox.

Please spare us your indignation at being banned from them. You post bollox=thread ban. You always did enjoy posting bollox.

If you don't like how the forum is moderated koff elsewhere and post bullsh1t to your hearts content.
Sorry how can I moan about it if I'm thread banned? How do you even know if I was moaning if you've never been in the thread.

I don't post about any whimsical fantasy formations. I've never mentioned a player we haven't been linked to. The fact you think the rumor is rubbish is irrelevant because there's no way for any of us to tell. It's an opinion not fact and opinions can be different.

What I post is my opinion where a player would fit in our current team which is exactly what a public forum is supposed to be for.

If you want to post in a private forum that's fine. Make it private.

I spent a whole day arguing with @MoutsGoat that Shaqiri could play in the middle and that's why I would buy him but he kept insisting he didn't play there even though if you go on whoscored you will see he played 90% of his games last season there.

Why?

I have no idea but I'm not going to be shouted down. If you don't like a player fine. You are entitled to that but if you give a BS reason why a player I like is wrong expect me to call you on it.
 

Sorry how can I moan about it if I'm thread banned? How do you even know if I was moaning if you've never been in the thread.

I don't post about any whimsical fantasy formations. I've never mentioned a player we haven't been linked to. The fact you think the rumor is rubbish is irrelevant because there's no way for any of us to tell. It's an opinion not fact and opinions can be different.

What I post is my opinion where a player would fit in our current team which is exactly what a public forum is supposed to be for.

If you want to post in a private forum that's fine. Make it private.

I spent a whole day arguing with @MoutsGoat that Shaqiri could play in the middle and that's why I would buy him but he kept insisting he didn't play there even though if you go on whoscored you will see he played 90% of his games last season there.

Why?

I have no idea but I'm not going to be shouted down. If you don't like a player fine. You are entitled to that but if you give a BS reason why a player I like is wrong expect me to call you on it.

You're going on about this public forum as though it's fine to post utter speculative tosh on it because it's your opinion so it's Ok because "that's what it's all about".

It's a pretty poor contribution to the forum really when you think about it.

It's actually a private forum as its owned, paid for and ran by @GrandOldTeam. The people he's appointed to enforce his rules have made it more than clear about, to put it into simpler terms "chatting utter bubbles" in the appointed transfer thread. Yet here we are. Here you are. Again.

Serious business this foruming isn't it?
 
You're going on about this public forum as though it's fine to post utter speculative tosh on it because it's your opinion so it's Ok because "that's what it's all about".

It's a pretty poor contribution to the forum really when you think about it.

It's actually a private forum as its owned, paid for and ran by @GrandOldTeam. The people he's appointed to enforce his rules have made it more than clear about, to put it into simpler terms "chatting utter bubbles" in the appointed transfer thread. Yet here we are. Here you are. Again.

Serious business this foruming isn't it?
It's not speculative. They're players we have been linked with.

Take Shaqiri for example.

Maybe @tommye is right and @MoutsGoat is retarded. His argument for why our Shaqiri bid was speculation certainly made no sense apart from the "everything is clickbait" argument.

Do you think it's more unlikely than likely that we bid for Shaqiri and if you disagree with me why?

Or even that we have interest in Shaqiri and why?

I'm failing to see which players I mention are speculation. I don't want to block up the forum any more than any one wants me to but I need to understand your reasons.

I thought Shaqiri looked perfectly reasonable
I even thought the Spurs deal for McCarthy from their end did.

I haven't posted anything else that could even come close to getting me banned.
 

It's not speculative. They're players we have been linked with.

Take Shaqiri for example.

Maybe @tommye is right and @MoutsGoat is retarded. His argument for why our Shaqiri bid was speculation certainly made no sense apart from the "everything is clickbait" argument.

Do you think it's more unlikely than likely that we bid for Shaqiri and if you disagree with me why?

Or even that we have interest in Shaqiri and why?

I'm failing to see which players I mention are speculation.

Oh wow. Just wow. I'm not going to flag that but you could be facing some time in the cooler for that.

Horrible.
 
Spot on this.
However , some of the egotists on the forum can't cope with the fact that their views aren't relevant to the credible thread and feel affronted that they're asked to post their views in tne speculation thread

TL;DR ?

Small penises are the cause of the problem

I agree.
 
Oh wow. Just wow. I'm not going to flag that but you could be facing some time in the cooler for that.

Horrible.
You see here's the problem. If you are going to mess with me then I'm going to mess with you too which will ultimately block up the forum which no-one wants.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top