It really infuriates me when idiots on this fora denegrate the opinon of this man because of his fondness for a few pints.
If Kendall lost 90% of his brain cells he would still have infinitely more knowledge ,experience and know how about football than those that mock him.
I always try to read his columns in the echo and his opinons are always interesting and provocative.
When he suggests that Duncan Ferguson should be considered when appointing a manager then at the very least that opinon is worth an intelligent discussion.
Kendall obviously feels that Ferguson has the qualities that would make him a successful manager.
The pros :
He played at top level until recently.
He has been back at the club coaching and the adult squad as well as academy players.
We know that he is forthright,independent,determined,bloodyminded.
We know that he has leadership qualities in abundance and commands enormous respect.
We know that his coaching abilities and influence on players have been praised by those working with him.
The cons :
He lacks managerial experience.
It seems to me that he ticks the boxes for a manager in nearly all areas bar one and as Kendall suggested the appointment of a mentor like Peter Reid or Joe Royle would in part at least solve that problem.
Would it be far worse a risk than bringing a manager from a lesser European league who has no knowledge of country or league(Pereria) ?
I supported Everton in the 70s ,80s and thereafter.I learned a long time ago that when Howard Kendall speaks you shut up and listen.I wish others would do the same.
If Kendall lost 90% of his brain cells he would still have infinitely more knowledge ,experience and know how about football than those that mock him.
I always try to read his columns in the echo and his opinons are always interesting and provocative.
When he suggests that Duncan Ferguson should be considered when appointing a manager then at the very least that opinon is worth an intelligent discussion.
Kendall obviously feels that Ferguson has the qualities that would make him a successful manager.
The pros :
He played at top level until recently.
He has been back at the club coaching and the adult squad as well as academy players.
We know that he is forthright,independent,determined,bloodyminded.
We know that he has leadership qualities in abundance and commands enormous respect.
We know that his coaching abilities and influence on players have been praised by those working with him.
The cons :
He lacks managerial experience.
It seems to me that he ticks the boxes for a manager in nearly all areas bar one and as Kendall suggested the appointment of a mentor like Peter Reid or Joe Royle would in part at least solve that problem.
Would it be far worse a risk than bringing a manager from a lesser European league who has no knowledge of country or league(Pereria) ?
I supported Everton in the 70s ,80s and thereafter.I learned a long time ago that when Howard Kendall speaks you shut up and listen.I wish others would do the same.