'The Battle of Goodison at 50' - 1964.

Status
Not open for further replies.

hullefc

Player Valuation: £35m
‘The battle of Goodison’ at 50: 1964, Everton and Leeds lose their manners and tempers
• For the first time in a league match a referee walked off the pitch because of violent play
• Too much money in the game blamed for worsening behaviour, said football authorities

9718eeed-8711-4ca4-ba00-78628654fae1-460x276.jpeg

Leeds’ Billy Bremner (centre) is protected by teammate Norman Hunter as an angry home fan is held back by Everton’s Johnny Morrissey, 1964. Photograph: Harry Ormesher/REX
A ‘spine-chilling’ encounter was how Jack Archer, a reporter for The People, describe Everton’s match against Leeds in 1964 - a game that saw a player sent off in the fourth minute following a chest-high tackle, two players felled after a clash of heads and fans warned for spitting at players.

Such was the hostility the referee, in a first for an English league game, marched both teams off the pitch so that the players and fans could cool down. When the enforced ten-minute break ended, a tannoy announcement warned that any further crowd trouble could see the game abandoned.

Although the First Division match was completed - Leeds winning 1-0 - mounted police then had to disperse angry fans from the streets around Goodison.

Even in an era when bloodcurdling tackles and unruly behaviour were common, the level of violence shocked the public. The match led to a period of reflection but not before the national press had its say.

An ‘unhappy day for English football’ was how the Observer’s John Arlott described it.

Brian Crowther, match reporter for the Guardian, went further, blaming the players for their ‘collective irresponsibility’, the fans for their ‘disgusting behaviour’ and the referee for ‘not being firm enough.’

1a9bf3d1-87b9-45ad-86e7-7354e5111a3d-460x276.jpeg

The Guardian, 9 November 1964. Read article in full. Photograph: Guardian
Mr Joe Richards, president of the Football League, reacted rather predictably, saying: ‘Something must be done and we must find out the causes.’ His best theory was that players were ‘getting so much money for points.’

Richards’ comments were probably an attack on the decision to lift the ceiling on players’ wages a few years earlier following a campaign by Jimmy Hill, chairman of the Professional Footballers’ Association. That decision still rankled with some in the game.

b01bc9b2-db5e-41bd-bf85-110ced7cde8c-460x276.jpeg

The Guardian, 9 November 1964. Read article in full. Photograph: Guardian
In the absence of anything like solid evidence to prove better money meant a disregard for the rules, the more objective voices in the game pointed to the competitive nature of both teams as one reason for the fiery encounter.

Certainly both teams had form. Less than a year earlier, an FA Cup fourth round match between the two at Elland Road ended in a fractious 1-1 draw. Writing for the Guardian, Eric Todd noted: ‘Leeds committed the first misdemeanour, and this was followed at regular intervals by fouls of subtle, fragrant, and sometimes cruel variation on both sides.’

By the time the two met again at Goodison in November, Leeds - managed by Don Revie and marshalled on the pitch by dogged competitors like Jack Charlton, Billy Bremner and Norman Hunter - had furthered their reputation as an uncompromising team; this was largely the same team that had been promoted the year before with a terrible disciplinary record. But Leeds could also play attractive football, as this match report showed.

2fbe031e-434b-43a2-84b3-575ee156d51b-460x276.jpeg

The Guardian, 12 November 1964. Read article in full. Photograph: Guardian
Nonetheless, it was their game against Everton - or the ‘Battle of Goodison’ - that the FA disciplinary committee was interested in when it met on 9 December 1964. The committee suspended Everton’s Sandy Brown for two weeks for his sending off following a punch on Leeds’John Giles in the fourth minute of the game. The FA also punished Everton for the behaviour of their fans. Leeds came out unscathed.

The FA’s judgement came with a promise that they would take a firmer line with player discipline. They also threatened to close grounds if clubs didn’t tackle ‘rowdy’ behaviour.

Odd that it is Morrisey that is stopping the fan, from getting at Bremner, considering he was in the thick of it.
 

If too much money is to blame for the violence then a modern game of football would play out like a ww1 trench battle.
 

‘The battle of Goodison’ at 50: 1964, Everton and Leeds lose their manners and tempers
• For the first time in a league match a referee walked off the pitch because of violent play
• Too much money in the game blamed for worsening behaviour, said football authorities

9718eeed-8711-4ca4-ba00-78628654fae1-460x276.jpeg

Leeds’ Billy Bremner (centre) is protected by teammate Norman Hunter as an angry home fan is held back by Everton’s Johnny Morrissey, 1964. Photograph: Harry Ormesher/REX
A ‘spine-chilling’ encounter was how Jack Archer, a reporter for The People, describe Everton’s match against Leeds in 1964 - a game that saw a player sent off in the fourth minute following a chest-high tackle, two players felled after a clash of heads and fans warned for spitting at players.

Such was the hostility the referee, in a first for an English league game, marched both teams off the pitch so that the players and fans could cool down. When the enforced ten-minute break ended, a tannoy announcement warned that any further crowd trouble could see the game abandoned.

Although the First Division match was completed - Leeds winning 1-0 - mounted police then had to disperse angry fans from the streets around Goodison.

Even in an era when bloodcurdling tackles and unruly behaviour were common, the level of violence shocked the public. The match led to a period of reflection but not before the national press had its say.

An ‘unhappy day for English football’ was how the Observer’s John Arlott described it.

Brian Crowther, match reporter for the Guardian, went further, blaming the players for their ‘collective irresponsibility’, the fans for their ‘disgusting behaviour’ and the referee for ‘not being firm enough.’

1a9bf3d1-87b9-45ad-86e7-7354e5111a3d-460x276.jpeg

The Guardian, 9 November 1964. Read article in full. Photograph: Guardian
Mr Joe Richards, president of the Football League, reacted rather predictably, saying: ‘Something must be done and we must find out the causes.’ His best theory was that players were ‘getting so much money for points.’

Richards’ comments were probably an attack on the decision to lift the ceiling on players’ wages a few years earlier following a campaign by Jimmy Hill, chairman of the Professional Footballers’ Association. That decision still rankled with some in the game.

b01bc9b2-db5e-41bd-bf85-110ced7cde8c-460x276.jpeg

The Guardian, 9 November 1964. Read article in full. Photograph: Guardian
In the absence of anything like solid evidence to prove better money meant a disregard for the rules, the more objective voices in the game pointed to the competitive nature of both teams as one reason for the fiery encounter.

Certainly both teams had form. Less than a year earlier, an FA Cup fourth round match between the two at Elland Road ended in a fractious 1-1 draw. Writing for the Guardian, Eric Todd noted: ‘Leeds committed the first misdemeanour, and this was followed at regular intervals by fouls of subtle, fragrant, and sometimes cruel variation on both sides.’

By the time the two met again at Goodison in November, Leeds - managed by Don Revie and marshalled on the pitch by dogged competitors like Jack Charlton, Billy Bremner and Norman Hunter - had furthered their reputation as an uncompromising team; this was largely the same team that had been promoted the year before with a terrible disciplinary record. But Leeds could also play attractive football, as this match report showed.

2fbe031e-434b-43a2-84b3-575ee156d51b-460x276.jpeg

The Guardian, 12 November 1964. Read article in full. Photograph: Guardian
Nonetheless, it was their game against Everton - or the ‘Battle of Goodison’ - that the FA disciplinary committee was interested in when it met on 9 December 1964. The committee suspended Everton’s Sandy Brown for two weeks for his sending off following a punch on Leeds’John Giles in the fourth minute of the game. The FA also punished Everton for the behaviour of their fans. Leeds came out unscathed.

The FA’s judgement came with a promise that they would take a firmer line with player discipline. They also threatened to close grounds if clubs didn’t tackle ‘rowdy’ behaviour.

Odd that it is Morrisey that is stopping the fan, from getting at Bremner, considering he was in the thick of it.

DIRTY LEEDS
 
Blame; 49% - 25% - 25% - 1%

1) Revie for formulating it ( based on his own fear of failure and self doubt ) and the Leeds team for really really buying into his methods and ethos.
1a) Extenuating circumstances?... none. total bells (except Bobby Collins)
1b) Thing is they could play a bit so why the snide ( see 1 above )

2) The Reff.
2a) Extenuating circumstances?...well probably, He ( or we for that matter ) had never seen the like of the Leeds carry on before, there may have been the odd Reff who was capable of getting a grip, he was just unlucky, wrong man, wrong place.

3) Our Players.
3a) Extenuating circumstances?...ever so slightly ( see 2a ) but in real terms it still takes 2 to tango.
Those who were there, like me, could see that although some of the others were just bad bells and that Bremner was a snide of the first order, It was Giles who was Revie's Grand Poobah of Snide... except for the biting is up there with the ratboy.
The whole Brown incident happen that quick, all I really saw was Giles go down ala sniper in the stands, leaving Brown stood like that classic photo of Clay over Liston.
We all know that whatever else his faults were Sandy wasn't a bad lad of the Bremner snide type, so whatever happened in that tussle must have so incensed Sandy as to demand instinctive retribution.

4) The Crowd... well what else are we going to do given the blatant naked Injustices happening on field.
4a) Extenuating circumstances... Blameless us.
4b) Even back then, no excuses for the terrible racist stuff we gave their winger though. Hope we know better now.

No doubt that the Leeds version will be totally revisionist.

Any footage of this game??
 
...remember that one. From about then through to early 70s Leeds had a side full of top players who were all hard cases. They saw Everton as their main rivals, indeed I saw Jack Charlton asked recently about games v United and Liverpool and he responded by saying Everton was their biggest game.

Charlton himself had a running feud with Jonny Morrissey. Those games were real battles, Joe Royle scored that great header from Bally's pass at Elland Road in title winning season (I think).
 

...except for England v Poland, eh? @degsy is right highlighting Giles, what a player but a nasty piece of work with it. The atmosphere was white hot nasty for those games it really was.

Haha! Nah, he spent his last few years at Bristol City, and saw for myself that he was so much more than "bite yer legs". Pretty much kept the team up for 3 years. Scored a screamer against Leeds once.
 
Haha! Nah, he spent his last few years at Bristol City, and saw for myself that he was so much more than "bite yer legs". Pretty much kept the team up for 3 years. Scored a screamer against Leeds once.

....of course he did. Remember now that he played for Bristol City and understand why you like him. He was a fine player.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top