Don't think we appointed Brands to discover players like Wellbeck.
Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Bingo.Can we not mention this players name on here again, as I would like to think that we have ambition.
This guy was linked about 5 years ago we have moved on since then
2018-19: 5 goals in 14 appearances. Not too shabby?
But we will become a retirement home for Arsenal, instead of United's cast offs. Can we have Giroud?
2018-19: 5 goals in 14 appearances. Not too shabby?
But we will become a retirement home for Arsenal, instead of United's cast offs. Can we have Giroud?
Was it that much? He probably would've been okay for us, but we were already slow.Remember Koeman wanted to pay 40 mill for Giroud. Good lord.
Was it that much? He probably would've been okay for us, but we were already slow.
People are too quick to tackle Danny boi
Right environment and he's potential
So much wrong with this I dont know where to start.People might not like to hear it, but I can totally see Brands signing Welbeck, and intending for him to be a 4th winger, 3rd striker option. Hes all about budget, value, and saving money in places so it can be spent at the times it needs to be. If his wage demands are too high, Brands will just walk, but if they arent I can easily see him seeing the value in signing Welbeck as an experienced backup to free us up to sell Walcott, Niasse, Vlasic, Lookman, Tosun, Bolasie, etc. Sell that lot who we dont want starting next season anyway(with the exception of lookman, but Silva doesnt favor him), pocket 70 million, replace for free, and then sell Welbeck next season for 5 million.
The reality is with the likes of Lookman, Walcott, and Tosun sold as we expect, even if we bring in a top CF, and a top RW, we need someone who can be the 3rd CF, and 4th Winger. Its a position you need for insurance, but you dont want to waste money on.