Successful deception of match officials

[TheFinnFan]

Yesterday -in WHULEI game- there was atleast two clear cases of deception. Expecting bans.

Interesting to see how many there will be today. Discuss cases here. Good luck to diving panel to work these cases. We need to enforce rules Fairly and Equally. Thanks.

 

[B17BLG]

Yep, I thought exactly that when Ayew went down the little scruff. Jamie Carragher saying well there was contact the absolute danger.

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

Leicester lad went down
No pen
So 2 game ban
Vardy claimed for a throw in which clearly came off him last
2 game ban

 

[DualityNSNO]

Lads we all know these things won't happen and the next ban will be a 153 game ban for Bolasie when he trips over his feet and we're given a random free kick.

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

Yesterday -in WHULEI game- there was atleast two clear cases of deception. Expecting bans.

Interesting to see how many there will be today. Discuss cases here. Good luck to diving panel to work these cases. We need to enforce rules Fairly and Equally. Thanks.

Ban's only come into play when a player has dived, and the ref awards a pen Finners, if a player blatantly dives in the box, and the ref doesn't give the pen, then no action is taken against that player (maybe a yellow card from the ref) Also, you don't get punished for conning the ref by diving to win a free - kick, even if your team scores from that free - kick.

 

[Alan Whittle]

for Bolasie when he trips over his feet

Oh! Like that's gonna happen...

 

[Khalekan]

Yesterday -in WHULEI game- there was atleast two clear cases of deception. Expecting bans.

Interesting to see how many there will be today. Discuss cases here. Good luck to diving panel to work these cases. We need to enforce rules Fairly and Equally. Thanks.

But it seems they have moved the goalposts.

They have added a bit which states “gains significant advantage” from the deception.

This presumably means winning a penno from which your team scores.

Which is nonsense of course.....the “significant advantage” of a goal can come from “deception” anywhere on the pitch.

Because I can successfully deceive the linesman that a ball which came off me for a throw in on the halfway line had actually came off an opposition player and from the resulting throw in my striker scores

This bollox will collapse under the weight of its own absurdity before too long.

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

Ban's only come into play when a player has dived, and the ref awards a pen Finners, if a player blatantly dives in the box, and the ref doesn't give the pen, then no action is taken against that player (maybe a yellow card from the ref) Also, you don't get punished for conning the ref by diving to win a free - kick, even if your team scores from that free - kick.

CBA checking but I'm sure a penalty kick is no different from a free kick in principle
Being if you're fouled inside the box a penalty kick is given outside it's where the offence took place
I'm determined to get Niasse off his ban

 

[Khalekan]

If you are going to do this you would be much better having a video ref adjudicating there and then.

That way the team on the wrong end of it are not being doubly punished.

Because if Oumar had been properly guilty as charged then Palace are suffering twice over.

First up with the goal from the penno which denied then two extra points.

Plus Oumar, our top scorer, will miss out a game against a team in the bottom three with them, Hammers.

In fact, Palace would have been better off applying to drop the charges, if such a course of action is allowed, so as he could play in that game

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

CBA checking but I'm sure a penalty kick is no different from a free kick in principle
Being if you're fouled inside the box a penalty kick is given outside it's where the offence took place
I'm determined to get Niasse off his ban

Whilst Niasse did go down very, very easily I think the FA have made a rod for their own backs with his ban because, every time a player goes down now and wins a pen with minimal contact, they'll have to be seen to be being consistent, and charge that player.

 

[heatmeiser]

Whilst Niasse did go down very, very easily I think the FA have made a rod for their own backs with his ban because, every time a player goes down now and wins a pen with minimal contact, they'll have to be seen to be being consistent, and charge that player.

They won't though, that's the problem.

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

They won't though, that's the problem.

That's a given mate.

 

[Jacob]

If you are going to do this you would be much better having a video ref adjudicating there and then.

That way the team on the wrong end of it are not being doubly punished.

Because if Oumar had been properly guilty as charged then Palace are suffering twice over.

First up with the goal from the penno which denied then two extra points.

Plus Oumar, our top scorer, will miss out a game against a team in the bottom three with them, Hammers.

In fact, Palace would have been better off applying to drop the charges, if such a course of action is allowed, so as he could play in that game

Yes. If they are truly serious about enforcing this, they need to back it up with technology to establish the extent of contact/intent/simulation etc. A decision could be made quickly before any on pitch sanction - card/pen - is made. It could very well make the 3 man adjudication panel redundant (or at least less necessary) - better given the variants of interpretation of what has been seen and also not have to rely on the 'Pools Panel' nature of them. It could also dilute the field day the media have after controversy occurs too...trial by tv pundit now having become the accepted norm/pain in the arse.

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

Looking forward to harry Kane falling over after being sneezed at just before the world cup next year

 

[chrissyjack]

They won't though, that's the problem.

Nothing else will happen . The FA have made their "example" to make people think they're doing something . Tits