Stats that quantify why we aren't good enough...

Status
Not open for further replies.

CRIMHEAD

Player Valuation: £40m
...most of you who have a brain and know anything about footy can see that our problems are not tactical, it is the quality on the ball. We simply don't have it.

A couple intersting tidbits on Whoscored:

We are DEAD LAST in "unsuccessful touches" and 2nd worst in the league in "dispossessed".

Think about that. Now those stats are a bit dubious and subjective. They are both going to be higher for any team that has the ball a lot. However, those are really high. To be high in one vs. the other might indicate some sort of tactical preference. But is this the fault of Marco Silva's particular tactics? Considering he's never been a Pep type coach that LOVES possession, I don't believe so. It's that our players aren't good enough with the ball.

Now Richarlison is the worst on the team in both categories, and I think it's definitely the weakest part of his game, but he's also been playing up top for us a bit. But Theo Walcott isn't producing like Richarlison and he's #2.

Being "dispossessed" is a relative stat as if you are holding the ball a lot, it's going to happen. Gomes is on the high end, but he has the ball more than anyone and leads our team in successful dribbles. Digne is high, but he averages over 2 key passes a game. Walcott is inexcusable. Coleman isn't great, either.

In terms of "unsuccessful touches", which is defined as 'bad control', against, Richarlison, but Walcott is right behind him. Bernard is high, but he's low on the dispossessed scale and he creates chances. He also is a good passer as his #'s indicate as such. Digne is unreal, he rarely makes a bad touch when we watch him and his numbers indicate the same. Coleman is again too high for his position. Gylfi is high, but he's average over 2 key passes a game and is usually doing so in the opposition's final 3rd.

Sooooo...my conclusions?

Even those we have a lot of possession, that we create a lot of chances, that we even have some decent dribbling numbers, those numbers are WAY too high.

The right side is indeed the problem, they aren't taking care of the ball, and it's pretty obvious. Coleman needs to sit down along with Walcott, but the team as a whole needs to do better. Silva might want to even consider sitting down Richarlison and playing Lookman out left, but he probably just needs a rest and better support.

I might do a more thorough analysis with those numbers relative to possession.
 

...most of you who have a brain and know anything about footy can see that our problems are not tactical, it is the quality on the ball. We simply don't have it.

A couple intersting tidbits on Whoscored:

We are DEAD LAST in "unsuccessful touches" and 2nd worst in the league in "dispossessed".

Think about that. Now those stats are a bit dubious and subjective. They are both going to be higher for any team that has the ball a lot. However, those are really high. To be high in one vs. the other might indicate some sort of tactical preference. But is this the fault of Marco Silva's particular tactics? Considering he's never been a Pep type coach that LOVES possession, I don't believe so. It's that our players aren't good enough with the ball.

Now Richarlison is the worst on the team in both categories, and I think it's definitely the weakest part of his game, but he's also been playing up top for us a bit. But Theo Walcott isn't producing like Richarlison and he's #2.

Being "dispossessed" is a relative stat as if you are holding the ball a lot, it's going to happen. Gomes is on the high end, but he has the ball more than anyone and leads our team in successful dribbles. Digne is high, but he averages over 2 key passes a game. Walcott is inexcusable. Coleman isn't great, either.

In terms of "unsuccessful touches", which is defined as 'bad control', against, Richarlison, but Walcott is right behind him. Bernard is high, but he's low on the dispossessed scale and he creates chances. He also is a good passer as his #'s indicate as such. Digne is unreal, he rarely makes a bad touch when we watch him and his numbers indicate the same. Coleman is again too high for his position. Gylfi is high, but he's average over 2 key passes a game and is usually doing so in the opposition's final 3rd.

Sooooo...my conclusions?

Even those we have a lot of possession, that we create a lot of chances, that we even have some decent dribbling numbers, those numbers are WAY too high.

The right side is indeed the problem, they aren't taking care of the ball, and it's pretty obvious. Coleman needs to sit down along with Walcott, but the team as a whole needs to do better. Silva might want to even consider sitting down Richarlison and playing Lookman out left, but he probably just needs a rest and better support.

I might do a more thorough analysis with those numbers relative to possession.
Our problems are not tactical ........Christ.

Silva chucks a load of players forward leaving us exposed at the back and you don't see that as a problem.
 
Richarlison´s ball retention is extremely poor and so often kills our attacks. That´s why I think he´s actually better through the middle where he can just concentrate on being a pain in the backside to defenders and getting on the end of things.
 

Our problems are not tactical ........Christ.

Silva chucks a load of players forward leaving us exposed at the back and you don't see that as a problem.

I think the tactics are probably wrong in terms of Silva and the fans overestimating what we have at our disposal. Without wanting to sound ridiculously Allardyce we probably need to be more pragmatic.
 
Good analysis to be fair.

Apart from the replacing Richarlison with Lookman nonsense.

How about we just play Richarlison, our best goalscorer, through the middle where he can get more goals.

The other key issue this year is we miss so many chances. We are woeful in front of goal.
 
Richarlison´s ball retention is extremely poor and so often kills our attacks. That´s why I think he´s actually better through the middle where he can just concentrate on being a pain in the backside to defenders and getting on the end of things.

I think at times we put him in bad spots by playing him the ball with his back to the goal. But yes, I'm fine with him losing it as long as he's closer to goal and trying to create something. It just stinks when he's on the left because he's great at sneaking in the finishing crosses from the right, but when they are giving the ball away right and left, it's just not as effective.

With as many crosses as we fire in - Digne in particular, it's not just the lack of a CF that hurts us, it's the lack of an aerial or finishing threat from both sides. Walcott isn't finishing either AND he's givine the ball away when he has it on the other side.
 

Good analysis to be fair.

Apart from the replacing Richarlison with Lookman nonsense.

How about we just play Richarlison, our best goalscorer, through the middle where he can get more goals.

The other key issue this year is we miss so many chances. We are woeful in front of goal.

It was simply a thought of course. We are kinda woeful in front of goal. But imagine if we kept the ball and got 4 or 5 more chances a game relative to the competition as a result?
 
I was staggered how quickly the ball is racing toward the Everton half when Walcott and Coleman mainly Walcott have the ball deep in opposition half and on Tuesday I was disgusted with how cheaply we gave the ball to Leicester,the basics have escaped us badly
 
I think at times we put him in bad spots by playing him the ball with his back to the goal. But yes, I'm fine with him losing it as long as he's closer to goal and trying to create something. It just stinks when he's on the left because he's great at sneaking in the finishing crosses from the right, but when they are giving the ball away right and left, it's just not as effective.

With as many crosses as we fire in - Digne in particular, it's not just the lack of a CF that hurts us, it's the lack of an aerial or finishing threat from both sides. Walcott isn't finishing either AND he's givine the ball away when he has it on the other side.

All of the points you´re making must give the opposition a lot of hope when playing against us. The majority of sides know when they come to Goodison they´ll have to surrender the majority of possession but know that if they get themselves organised we will struggle to hurt them.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top