Spy Games - Prism

Status
Not open for further replies.

steken1

Player Valuation: £70m
This is a Q&A with the whistleblower who has spilled the beans about secret spying by the US NSA aided and abetted(allegedly) by google among others.

Very interesting as it shines a bit of light on a very secretive part of our Government/Society.

For me, I'm struggling to understand the outrage. I've always assumed that this type of thing goes on and trigger words in e-mails and the like were looked at by all security services.



News
World news
The NSA files

Edward Snowden, NSA whistleblower: 'I do not expect to see home again'

Source for the Guardian's NSA files on why he carried out the biggest intelligence leak in a generation – and what comes next

Share 32501
inShare129
Email

Ewen MacAskill
The Guardian, Sunday 9 June 2013

Link to video: NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: 'I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things'

Edward Snowden was interviewed over several days in Hong Kong by Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill.

Q: Why did you decide to become a whistleblower?

A: "The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife's phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.

"I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things … I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under."

Q: But isn't there a need for surveillance to try to reduce the chances of terrorist attacks such as Boston?

A: "We have to decide why terrorism is a new threat. There has always been terrorism. Boston was a criminal act. It was not about surveillance but good, old-fashioned police work. The police are very good at what they do."

Q: Do you see yourself as another Bradley Manning?

A: "Manning was a classic whistleblower. He was inspired by the public good."

Q: Do you think what you have done is a crime?

A: "We have seen enough criminality on the part of government. It is hypocritical to make this allegation against me. They have narrowed the public sphere of influence."

Q: What do you think is going to happen to you?

A: "Nothing good."

Q: Why Hong Kong?

A: "I think it is really tragic that an American has to move to a place that has a reputation for less freedom. Still, Hong Kong has a reputation for freedom in spite of the People's Republic of China. It has a strong tradition of free speech."

Q: What do the leaked documents reveal?

A: "That the NSA routinely lies in response to congressional inquiries about the scope of surveillance in America. I believe that when [senator Ron] Wyden and [senator Mark] Udall asked about the scale of this, they [the NSA] said it did not have the tools to provide an answer. We do have the tools and I have maps showing where people have been scrutinised most. We collect more digital communications from America than we do from the Russians."
nsa whistleblower Snowden is a 29-year-old former technical assistant for the CIA

Q: What about the Obama administration's protests about hacking by China?

A: "We hack everyone everywhere. We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries."

Q: Is it possible to put security in place to protect against state surveillance?

A: "You are not even aware of what is possible. The extent of their capabilities is horrifying. We can plant bugs in machines. Once you go on the network, I can identify your machine. You will never be safe whatever protections you put in place."

Q: Does your family know you are planning this?

A: "No. My family does not know what is happening … My primary fear is that they will come after my family, my friends, my partner. Anyone I have a relationship with …

I will have to live with that for the rest of my life. I am not going to be able to communicate with them. They [the authorities] will act aggressively against anyone who has known me. That keeps me up at night."

Q: When did you decide to leak the documents?

A: "You see things that may be disturbing. When you see everything you realise that some of these things are abusive. The awareness of wrong-doing builds up. There was not one morning when I woke up [and decided this is it]. It was a natural process.

"A lot of people in 2008 voted for Obama. I did not vote for him. I voted for a third party. But I believed in Obama's promises. I was going to disclose it [but waited because of his election]. He continued with the policies of his predecessor."

Q: What is your reaction to Obama denouncing the leaks on Friday while welcoming a debate on the balance between security and openness?

A: "My immediate reaction was he was having difficulty in defending it himself. He was trying to defend the unjustifiable and he knew it."

Q: What about the response in general to the disclosures?

A: "I have been surprised and pleased to see the public has reacted so strongly in defence of these rights that are being suppressed in the name of security. It is not like Occupy Wall Street but there is a grassroots movement to take to the streets on July 4 in defence of the Fourth Amendment called Restore The Fourth Amendment and it grew out of Reddit. The response over the internet has been huge and supportive."

Q: Washington-based foreign affairs analyst Steve Clemons said he overheard at the capital's Dulles airport four men discussing an intelligence conference they had just attended. Speaking about the leaks, one of them said, according to Clemons, that both the reporter and leaker should be "disappeared". How do you feel about that?

A: "Someone responding to the story said 'real spies do not speak like that'. Well, I am a spy and that is how they talk. Whenever we had a debate in the office on how to handle crimes, they do not defend due process – they defend decisive action. They say it is better to kick someone out of a plane than let these people have a day in court. It is an authoritarian mindset in general."

Q: Do you have a plan in place?

A: "The only thing I can do is sit here and hope the Hong Kong government does not deport me … My predisposition is to seek asylum in a country with shared values. The nation that most encompasses this is Iceland. They stood up for people over internet freedom. I have no idea what my future is going to be.

"They could put out an Interpol note. But I don't think I have committed a crime outside the domain of the US. I think it will be clearly shown to be political in nature."

Q: Do you think you are probably going to end up in prison?

A: "I could not do this without accepting the risk of prison. You can't come up against the world's most powerful intelligence agencies and not accept the risk. If they want to get you, over time they will."

Q: How to you feel now, almost a week after the first leak?

A: "I think the sense of outrage that has been expressed is justified. It has given me hope that, no matter what happens to me, the outcome will be positive for America. I do not expect to see home again, though that is what I want."
 

they can read my emails, i only get chemists wanting to sell me penis enlargers and viagra. and ive won a african lottery about 9 times this year so far.

I've won it six. We should pool our winnings and buy prescot cables.
 
Difference between trigger words being looked at and the fact that they can indiscriminately look at all of your e-mails and other online documents whenever they like. It's a ridiculous breach of privacy really.

Having said that, it doesn't really bother me on a personal level as i have nothing to hide, or at least nothing which would have the police after me.
 
Difference between trigger words being looked at and the fact that they can indiscriminately look at all of your e-mails and other online documents whenever they like. It's a ridiculous breach of privacy really.

Having said that, it doesn't really bother me on a personal level as i have nothing to hide, or at least nothing which would have the police after me.

Yeah, it's a bit dodgy that they're listening to everything. They must have the sky unlimited broadband. Imagine the bandwith all those E-mails would take up.
 

Difference between trigger words being looked at and the fact that they can indiscriminately look at all of your e-mails and other online documents whenever they like. It's a ridiculous breach of privacy really.

Having said that, it doesn't really bother me on a personal level as i have nothing to hide, or at least nothing which would have the police after me.

Racist!!!!
 
"We hack everyone everywhere. We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries."

That's a little bit naughty, America.
 
i'd be disappointed if they werent doing this. I'd rather they snooped on a mail of mine telling my dad via email that hibbert will never ever score than get blown up by a lunatic with an imaginary friend and dangerous cause. To think that they'll have the time to look into the mails of everyday folk is fanciful, they've got enough on their plate looking into the bad guys they already do know about
 
Snowden's left Hong Kong for the freedom of speech sanctuary of Moscow.

Not very good PR for Washington!
 

I found it rather humorous that President McStazi actually seemed suprised that only 52 Germans showed up to hear him speak this time.
 
what winds me up is its not about having something to hide or not, its basic liberty and freedom thats at stake, I cant remember the quote but its very true that if your willing to give freedom/freedom of speech up you deserve neither where do you draw the line? how long before random door to door knocks to inspect properties for "terrorist activity"? or mandatory homes/cars fitted with spyware? its not on for me mate we are hypocrites of the highest order we were outraged when the nazi's did it, when the communists did it, and more recently when the N. Koreans/chinese do it
 
You mean this: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety"
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top