Your last statement is entirely subjective and impossible to quantify.
Subjectively, l disagree.
Another manager could keep us up and prepare us for a better future.
Another manager could certainly improve the standard and quality of football on offer.
But we are both discussing hypothetical situations here and neither of us will ever be proved wrong or right.
It’s just opinions.
I agree that it is entirely subjective.
I also agree that it is entirely possible that another manager could keep us up, improve the standard and quality of football, and better prepare us for the future under the same conditions currently faced by Sean Dyche.
Perhaps, I am less inclined to believe in such an idealistic outcome based on the history of the club and what change of manager has brought us in recent memory.
Evaluating the prospect of changing manager from a risk management prospective, I would compare:
Likelihood of being able to attract a better manager than Sean Dyche for our current situation given the dire circumstances the club is in.
&
Severity of the outcome of the more probable outcome of hiring a manager of varying degrees worse than Sean Dyche and adding to that the elements of instability that accompany change.
VS
Likelihood of Sean Dyche keeping us up for 2 more seasons.
&
Severity of the outcome if we were to be relegated with him in charge.
Subjectively I would choose the latter as my perception is that there is less risk; however, I can appreciate that some may view our situation as so dire that they view the only way out is to assume more risk, but again, I feel that to assume more risk would be short sighted and ill advised.
