I'm guessing obviously but I don't think Warrington is in the clubs plans I think putting him on for a couple of minutes was a bit of nice man management to say go and live your dream for a few minutes lad it wasn't to give him experience for us or see what he could do it was just a reward for hard work and a nice thing to do for a kid when the opportunity is there.
My son is mates, with his mates, who are mates, with some mates of his.
Its funny that even these made up arguments can be used to prove whatever you want them to prove if he chose Whittaker you'd have people saying well of course he wouldn't want Nani because he's foreign and he does fancy tricks he wants Whittaker because he's English and 6 foot 2 he's such a typical Dyche player.
Dyche has been talking him up for a while, and been saying how well he’s been training etc.
Got talking to Warrington’s brothers mate in the blue house before the Brentford game who told me exactly the same about Lewis getting promised minutes - never happened then either.
If 2 teams finish with the same number of wins & losses, same goals scored & conceded, and the 2 games versus each other were no-score draws, I think technically joint 10th is possible. Not that it makes any difference tho.
That what I'm saying really that Dyche has let him go and get on the pitch because he's been training well but that doesn't mean he's actually got the ability to play at this level consistently I'm not saying he definitely hasn't but he obviously couldn't get a game in the championship and i remember someone posting on here that the coaches there had said he wasn't even close to getting games he was well off the pace. Like I said i'm guessing but theres not a lot on Warringtons CV that makes me think he's going to be playing regularly for us I assumed he was just getting a reward for hard work and being a good lad i'd love to be wrong about that though.
Think we’re going to let him go actually, more chance of us signing Gazza back, or even Lampard as a midfielder than any of the kids playing meaningful minutes.
Surely Dyche would buy a Dyson?
think it goes alphabetically like at the start of the season
We haven’t the players to play free flowing football.But that's what I mean - it's not. It goes both ways, not just "play 10 defenders", that doesn't make it pragmatic. The same way Pep, as his name gets thrown around because clearly if we don't like hoofball we must only enjoy Pepball, is pragmatic in a more expansive way in wanting to play his way but obviously preparing (and overthinking) for the opposition he's up against, just like every decent manager.
We don't do the thing in bold. Dyche himself, after we played hoofball 4-4-1-1 for 5 months, bafflingly stated "we switched it up and went a bit more long ball" against Burnleyas apparently that was something we don't do anyway. It will be the exact same 4-4-1-1 long ball regardless of players, maybe switch to a massively different 4-4-2 and long ball.
I'm okay with actual pragmatism but we have overly defensive negativity, not pragmatism. You have to have a plan going forward too for it to actually be pragmatic. In real life terms - this is currently planning only and entirely to not lose money, ignoring the part where you have to make a profit to keep the business running.
Literally haven't said anything about free flowing football at all, why do you keep using the other buzzword?
