bluenose125
Player Valuation: £500k
Apparently he doesn't know, remember him saying something along the lines of "ASK THE ACCOUNTANTS, I'M JUST THE CHAIRMAN".He hasn't got a clue.Where's the bill money, Bill?
Apparently he doesn't know, remember him saying something along the lines of "ASK THE ACCOUNTANTS, I'M JUST THE CHAIRMAN".He hasn't got a clue.Where's the bill money, Bill?
Didn't the great chairman Johnson consider relocating Everton to Kirkby golf club ?
If I knew that we wouldn't be talking about it. Last year Other operating expenses where itemised at £23.4m or thereabouts. That's a hell of a lot of dosh.
Despite the question being asked repeatedly,sometimes by bona fide share holders, no one has ever noffered up and kind of answer worth noting. Big Bob had a go at the 85p in the pound and said lawnmowers aren't cheap.
Johnson was considered a failure.
He re-built the Park End and invested his own money into the Club.
But he sold the fans idol, so was hounded out.
Kenwrong is considered a hero.
Hes watched as Goodison has gone backwards, hes invested not a single penny into the Club.
Hes sold 2 fans idols and the best English talent of a generation.
And still they clap.
He did brain storm the stadium issue and maybe that was mentioned in a quote , Nothing concrete , doubt he would of Forced it on anyone though like bill and his freeloaders , especially the way they dressed it upDidn't the great chairman Johnson consider relocating Everton to Kirkby golf club ?
Except he didn't. What he actually said was:
"That figure is made up of around twenty-five cost centres which like all areas of the Club are monitored constantly. It includes every item of expenditure that we incur besides wages. It is considerably less than many other clubs of similar size and there is absolutely no frivolous, extravagant or unrequired expenditure in there. To add to this, we've just hired procurement specialists to drive this number even lower.
365 days a year we maintain Goodison and Finch Farm. We pay rent, rates and a substantial utility bill. We maintain some of the best pitches in the League. We support a modern, secure IT and communications infrastructure. This season already we've hosted 24 games and paid the police and stewards, provided food in the lounges and supported an expensive matchday operation. Less often this season, we have travelled to away games and funded a large travelling party in a way that ensures we have the best possible chance to win the game. We sometimes fund a large travelling party of fans! Like all businesses we pay lawyers and accountants and advisers and auditors too much, but football is a business that attracts attention and we need help from our professional partners. It is a large and complex business."
If you want to compare it to other clubs, look up the operating expenses and subtract the wages.
Take Villas: Operating Expenses £111m, wages £79m = OOC £32m
http://astonvilla-views.com/2011/02/26/villa-record-a-loss-of-37m-for-the-year-avfc/
Spurs
Other Expenses £32m
http://swissramble.blogspot.ie/2011/12/tottenham-grounds-for-optimism-or.html
Sunderland
Total costs £110m, wages about £50m trading around £30m = Other Operating Cost about £30m
http://tyneandwear.sky.com/sunderland/article/16296
Oh I know it suits the general narrative to distill down data to a soundbite and then dismiss it, and it may suit the internet based fans to do so, but its done to keep a sense of self righteous indignation going.
The "Other Operating Costs" scandal is actually bolloxology of the highest order. I've said before that the board has a lot to answer for, and need to sell up to get investment in, but distracting crap like this helps no-one.
Didn't the great chairman Johnson consider relocating Everton to Kirkby golf club ?
Except he didn't. What he actually said was:
"That figure is made up of around twenty-five cost centres which like all areas of the Club are monitored constantly. It includes every item of expenditure that we incur besides wages. It is considerably less than many other clubs of similar size and there is absolutely no frivolous, extravagant or unrequired expenditure in there. To add to this, we've just hired procurement specialists to drive this number even lower.
365 days a year we maintain Goodison and Finch Farm. We pay rent, rates and a substantial utility bill. We maintain some of the best pitches in the League. We support a modern, secure IT and communications infrastructure. This season already we've hosted 24 games and paid the police and stewards, provided food in the lounges and supported an expensive matchday operation. Less often this season, we have travelled to away games and funded a large travelling party in a way that ensures we have the best possible chance to win the game. We sometimes fund a large travelling party of fans! Like all businesses we pay lawyers and accountants and advisers and auditors too much, but football is a business that attracts attention and we need help from our professional partners. It is a large and complex business."
If you want to compare it to other clubs, look up the operating expenses and subtract the wages.
Take Villas: Operating Expenses £111m, wages £79m = OOC £32m
http://astonvilla-views.com/2011/02/26/villa-record-a-loss-of-37m-for-the-year-avfc/
Spurs
Other Expenses £32m
http://swissramble.blogspot.ie/2011/12/tottenham-grounds-for-optimism-or.html
Sunderland
Total costs £110m, wages about £50m trading around £30m = Other Operating Cost about £30m
http://tyneandwear.sky.com/sunderland/article/16296
Oh I know it suits the general narrative to distill down data to a soundbite and then dismiss it, and it may suit the internet based fans to do so, but its done to keep a sense of self righteous indignation going.
The "Other Operating Costs" scandal is actually bolloxology of the highest order. I've said before that the board has a lot to answer for, and need to sell up to get investment in, but distracting crap like this helps no-one.
Except he didn't. What he actually said was:
"That figure is made up of around twenty-five cost centres which like all areas of the Club are monitored constantly. It includes every item of expenditure that we incur besides wages. It is considerably less than many other clubs of similar size and there is absolutely no frivolous, extravagant or unrequired expenditure in there. To add to this, we've just hired procurement specialists to drive this number even lower.
365 days a year we maintain Goodison and Finch Farm. We pay rent, rates and a substantial utility bill. We maintain some of the best pitches in the League. We support a modern, secure IT and communications infrastructure. This season already we've hosted 24 games and paid the police and stewards, provided food in the lounges and supported an expensive matchday operation. Less often this season, we have travelled to away games and funded a large travelling party in a way that ensures we have the best possible chance to win the game. We sometimes fund a large travelling party of fans! Like all businesses we pay lawyers and accountants and advisers and auditors too much, but football is a business that attracts attention and we need help from our professional partners. It is a large and complex business."
If you want to compare it to other clubs, look up the operating expenses and subtract the wages.
Take Villas: Operating Expenses £111m, wages £79m = OOC £32m
http://astonvilla-views.com/2011/02/26/villa-record-a-loss-of-37m-for-the-year-avfc/
Spurs
Other Expenses £32m
http://swissramble.blogspot.ie/2011/12/tottenham-grounds-for-optimism-or.html
Sunderland
Total costs £110m, wages about £50m trading around £30m = Other Operating Cost about £30m
http://tyneandwear.sky.com/sunderland/article/16296
Oh I know it suits the general narrative to distill down data to a soundbite and then dismiss it, and it may suit the internet based fans to do so, but its done to keep a sense of self righteous indignation going.
The "Other Operating Costs" scandal is actually bolloxology of the highest order. I've said before that the board has a lot to answer for, and need to sell up to get investment in, but distracting crap like this helps no-one.
that each has a massive category needing servicing beyond ordinary service expenses.
Yes, that is true. As opposed to "It feels wrong, and everyone knows the board are crooks anyway" which is basically the argument. Its usually accompanied by some pointless comment about handlebars, or uncle cyril or spaces or some such garbage.In short, you're using the barest of figures to concoct an equivalent scenario at those clubs.
Johnson was considered a failure.
He re-built the Park End and invested his own money into the Club.
But he sold the fans idol, so was hounded out.
Kenwrong is considered a hero.
Hes watched as Goodison has gone backwards, hes invested not a single penny into the Club.
Hes sold 2 fans idols and the best English talent of a generation.
And still they clap.