If City were sold to Bill Kenwright for a bag of chips they could sell 100m in players and still be a top four side. Plus they'd have 100m more than us. I'm cool with being dropped in that kind of a "mess." Do people say this because of the old "Abramovich put the debt onto Chelsea and if he ever leaves blah blah" thing? Because even that isn't true any longer. Chelsea are debt free now. If he left they'd sell some players and still be a top four side (at least a contender). QPR would be hurt I suppose but they aren't an established top Prem side (or a Prem side at all ... ha-ha!) so it's not like they are risking much getting in bed with a billionaire.Because we don't sell out to a sugar daddy who will drop us in the financial **** when he gets bored of his hobby.
Because we don't sell out to a sugar daddy who will drop us in the financial **** when he gets bored of his hobby.
You'll do. Stick with Kenwright mate, we dont want to be a franchise like that other lot.
Much more pride in doing it the hard way, and as has already been mentioned on this thread the minute the billionaire owner pulls out the resulting fallout could set the club back years, multi millionaire owner will do me fine.
cause were about spirit not money, but that always gets us 6th or 7th as of late.
WTF? I thought the consensus was anti-Kenwright round here.
What changed your mind? His tears at Moyst leaving?
WTF? I thought the consensus was anti-Kenwright round here.
What changed your mind? His tears at Moyst leaving?
QPR's owners are minted,look at them.Its no guarentee of sucess.Im sick of it.Why does everyone else but Everton get billionaire owners ?:angry:
QPR's owners are minted,look at them.Its no guarentee of sucess.
To be fair though, ive never seen so much money spent so badly since Martin O'Neill at Villa.
To be fair though, ive never seen so much money spent so badly since Martin O'Neill at Villa.
Bit of a slip there DH, keep it real kidda
First three comments are from 6 years ago.