6 + 2 Point Deductions

From Eric Myles;
In article 133 of the report the commission refer to the PL relying on a precedent from a lower league, Sheffield Wednesday vs. EFL.

In that case then our appeal should be based on the precedent set in the same league, that of Leicester and their £3.1 million "fine" which was a negotiated settlement after Leicester threatened to go to court on the grounds that the PSR was illegal.

They can't turn round and say the lower court / league Leicester ruling doesn't apply as they have already relied on the Sheffield Wednesday one.

Also, as Lyndon points out the Tevez West Ham affair where they were found to have had a sporting advantage but only had to pay a fine, not points deductions for a deliberate sporting advantage.

I would hope that our team would focus on these precedents when arguing that the punishment is excessive.

degsy;
Yes its a total hatchet job, but we put our own head on the block as we were bang to rights Guilty.
All we can do is argue poor precedent and excessive punishment.

As to being sued;
Yes the sad barstewards can apply...any body can 'apply' - but that doesn't mean it will necessarily succeed
 
We could easily end up losing about 6 league places because of it, that will be 12 mill. That’s pretty close to what the scab six had to pay as a combined fine. That’s in addition to the most penal points deduction in PL history, and comes on top of 3 seasons of selling our best players and two relegation battles.

We need to learn our lesson though about a 19 mill overspend.
This.

Even if we upset the PL and avoid the complete financial ruin of relegation we still end up losing out more financially than scab 6 payed out in fines for trying to ruin football.

Corrupt PL.
 

From Eric Myles;
In article 133 of the report the commission refer to the PL relying on a precedent from a lower league, Sheffield Wednesday vs. EFL.

In that case then our appeal should be based on the precedent set in the same league, that of Leicester and their £3.1 million "fine" which was a negotiated settlement after Leicester threatened to go to court on the grounds that the PSR was illegal.

They can't turn round and say the lower court / league Leicester ruling doesn't apply as they have already relied on the Sheffield Wednesday one.

Also, as Lyndon points out the Tevez West Ham affair where they were found to have had a sporting advantage but only had to pay a fine, not points deductions for a deliberate sporting advantage.

I would hope that our team would focus on these precedents when arguing that the punishment is excessive.

degsy;
Yes its a total hatchet job, but we put our own head on the block as we were bang to rights Guilty.
All we can do is argue poor precedent and excessive punishment.

As to being sued;
Yes the sad barstewards can apply...any body can 'apply' - but that doesn't mean it will necessarily succeed
All comes down us being nice little old honest Everton again.
 
From Eric Myles;

Also, as Lyndon points out the Tevez West Ham affair where they were found to have had a sporting advantage but only had to pay a fine, not points deductions for a deliberate sporting advantage.
And the reason they were able to quantify the "sporting advantage"? Tevez - who was signed illegally - scored the only goal of the game on the last day of the season that relegated Sheffield United.

They can't even quantify ours. And why would they when we've spent six years searching for it and come up empty-handed.
 

Even though we put ourselves in this position, with our appalling business model. We. Have tried to work with the Premier League to get our house in order over the past couple of years.

Ignoring all the "noise" - It could be argued that this breach is a technicality. And yet the punishment is quite close to being as severe as you can get when you compare to say administration.

There are so many drivers. As you said we've worked with the PL. We've admitted we breached. We've provided mitigating factors. Which by and large have been dismissed.

The no sporting gain versus sporting punishment is baffling. I've heard it suggested that we had sporting advantage by the very fact that we spent more than allowed (and broke the rules) but this was seen as accidental. So we didn't seek to gain sporting advantage. (This is more to do with the incompetent flakey running of the club). Bearing that in mind the punishment metered out - points deduction opposed to say a fine - based on first a hastily drawn up tarrif by the PL in August, and, that a fine would not be suitable given we have a wealthy owner. As pointed out in here actually, 10 points deduction on its own is a double punishment (fine) because our final table placing would (most likely!) be lower as a result therefore loss of prize money. *Maybe even the loss of European qualification.

And as we all know the breakaway 6's punishment was deemed a fine and not a points deduction. Er, do they not all have wealthy owners too? Why were they not given points deductions? "You can't punish the fans"..

This is just a can of worms. I hope Everton's legal team are better clued up in the appeal than they were for the hearing.
 

Top