• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

New Zealand should not be in SA

Status
Not open for further replies.

GhostOfDixie

Player Valuation: £70m
How can a team that is made up of lower league players be at the World Cup.

They haven't earned the right at all. This is who they have beaten on the way:

NZ (77)

New Caledonia (139), Fiji (133), Vanautu(157), Bahrain(61)

Teams not going (with their rankings)

Croatia (10)
Russia (13)
Czech Rep (23)
Ukrainia (24)
Israel (25)
Bulgaria (27)
Egypt (29)
Norway (31)
Romania (32)

These are teams in the top 32, and I believe they should change the format so the best teams over the 3.5 years since the last world cup should be allowed to qualify.

Or perhaps the top 16 and then the rest qualify. New Zealand are going to the world cup and going to be hammered. We may as well send Luxembourg.

Everyone gets points for achievements, so that is the best way to see who is the best 32 teams to play in the world cup.

We are not going to see Berbatov, Ibrahimovich. We nearly never got to see Ronaldo and Messi. But we are going to see Rory Fallon of Plymouth Argyle.

It's madness, and I know I will get the usual 'It's the beauty of the World Cup', but I would prefer to see the best players playing on the world stage.

The US team were garbage, the league wasn't much better. Then all of a sudden they worked hard, got themselves good academies, and they are a decent side with some really really good footballers.

But they had to play stiffer opposition then who New Zealand had to play.

Just my opinion.
 

Why because they beat a team who's wives still wear grass skirts?

We may as well send Luxembourg, should they not get a chance to go? It basically comes down to geography.
 

Either do France but they are. They qualify through the Oceania category and if they are the best in that division that then that's that isnt it? Russia, Croatia and Sweden all had there chances to qualify and didnt. Simple really. Good luck to them, i personally hope we get NZ and England in the Group Stages.
 
Either do France but they are. They qualify through the Oceania category and if they are the best in that division that then that's that isnt it? Russia, Croatia and Sweden all had there chances to qualify and didnt. Simple really. Good luck to them, i personally hope we get NZ and England in the Group Stages.

They'd nail us.
 
Why because they beat a team who's wives still wear grass skirts?

We may as well send Luxembourg, should they not get a chance to go? It basically comes down to geography.

Thats all it is mate, the World Cup isnt the best 32 teams, its about all the Regions coming together and seeing which is the best team.

The best teams are meant to show they are the best teams in qualifying, if you dont qualify its your own fault.
 
Why not just have previous World Cup winners taking part ? New Zealand are there because they did enough to qualify from their group.The likes of Russia and Croatia didn't. France and Portugal might not have made it if Blatter hadn't implimented seedings for the play-offs to help the " big teams" qualify.
 
n.z. are representing the area to which they belong.
i'm sure the same was probably said the last time they qualified, ialso remember it being said about the u.s./ australia/ african nations.

so yes they should be there.
 

Why not have a World Cup with all the minnow countries and invite England to take part :D

Mind you , we'd probably get beat in the quarter finals by someone like Fiji :blink:

chris jack is a kiwi....with a floret for an ear
chris-jack.jpg

all black and crusader.
 
So maybe the FA Cup should be played regionally too. So the best team in Merseyside should go through. That's fair isn't it?

It's a joke.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top