Baldynut
Player Valuation: £1m
Not according to Companies House he hasnt
deipnosophist
Player Valuation: £80m
Oh, I read he'd gone over 50% (bought Woods' shares)...but evidently that information was fake news
As was pointed out at the time of Moshiri bought into the club, some shares are missing ie nobody knows who they belong to and we haven't done so for way back in the club's history. Moshiri has the ability to win a vote of shareholders because of this. As such he is majority shareholder in all but name.
havrey0123
Player Valuation: £25m
1) how long will it take them to recoup all of the money
2) if there cutting the numbers of police and the army there not going to suddenly invest that sort of money into a stadium.
3) there no guarantee. How long moshiri will stick around for. His had his hand burnt once already through bad signings and paying tens of millions in compensation to managers
4) weighing up the pros.and cons.its a huge risk for the council.
Jacko93
Player Valuation: £35m
Who is the 'they' in point 2?
EFC78
Player Valuation: £25m
Presumably, the Council wouldn't agree to any deal with EFC without ensuring they are fully protected and that seems understandable to me. So all this 'risk' that repeatedly gets mentioned seems to me to be speculation by people who have no idea what the terms of the deal will be.
If Anderson/EFC can't ensure the protection for the Council in the event that things go badly for EFC, I very much doubt that a deal will be agreed.
Things seem to be moving slowly at the moment, but these Stadium projects often have complications and hurdles to overcome so I am not too concerned until I hear some negativity from EFC or Joe Anderson.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
I wouldn’t stand by any walls if I were you......
EFC78
Player Valuation: £25m
Can you explain how Warrington Council for example have managed to borrow £300m from the PWLB despite Police numbers having been cut then? According to this, the number of officers had decreased by 20K since 2010.
https://www.channel4.com/news/factc...ies-have-cut-20000-police-officers-since-2010
How have Warrington, a Town with a population of around 200K managed to obtain this money, yet you think that one of the major cities in England won't be able to?
Jacko93
Player Valuation: £35m
The handy thing to know would be what the loans are for.
Warrington have 46 outstanding loans from the PWLB, to a total of 463m. Their largest loan has a year end value of £67.2m, of which the final payment is due in 2056.
Liverpool has £290m in outstanding PWLB loans, over 24 separate loan agreements. Largest of which is a year end value of 38m with final payment in Sept 2057.
As a way of comparison, Nothampton Borough Council has £240m in oustanding PWLB loans, largest of which will have a value of £210m at the years end with a final payment date of 2062.
Birmingham, admittedly bigger than Liverpool has £2.25bn outstanding over 100 loans.
Not even worth looking at the London boroughs.
I’m against Joe Anderson because you can’t trust a word that comes out of his mouth, and he’s all for himself and nothing else. He has no support amongst his own party and is a paranoid mess acting a mini dictator in this city.
The problem with Anderson is he speaks without any knowledge. On one hand he’s negotiating a stadium with Kenwright and Moshiri and then goes to the Echo saying he doesn’t believe they’re running the club correct and wishes he could take over.
That’s separate to what’s he’s “let go” in the council, protecting his friends because what they may or may not have on him. If he would have got the MP position he wouldn’t have given a rats arse about the stadium because it’s all about the Joe show
scratchnsurf
Player Valuation: £40m
You seem to be misunderstanding where this money is coming from. It can't be used for other services as it isn't money they have in their budget. There should be more money for public services by using the fund as they gain interest on what they lend to the club.
Of course there's no guarantees - there never are with investments. The council have to weigh up the potential risk v potential reward, as they would with any deal of this type.
As I said previously, if they can get better returns elsewhere then fair enough. If they can get similar returns with less risk, then fair enough but saying they shouldn't do it because they can't put enough police on the streets is total nonsense. If the deal is done, there'd be more money for policing if that's how the council chose to spend it.
Some of this will depend on if/when the vote takes place
Whilst momentum now control the CLPs, they still haven't got many actual counsellors. Can't just get rid mid-term like that. It will be a process taking several years as counsellors are elected for 3 years at a time and they don't all change over the same year.
Whilst momentum now control the CLPs, they still haven't got many actual counsellors. Can't just get rid mid-term like that. It will be a process taking several years as counsellors are elected for 3 years at a time and they don't all change over the same year.
Do the first 2 letters in your name symbolise anything of significance you would like to shareMr andersonare you joe or just in the matrix.
We are quite an accepting bunch on here
